No this is news to me .I would have thought that decling to vote would simply have continued the status quo.700UW said:Do you realize if you vote no to strike and vote no on the last and final offer, it becomes your new CBA?
freedom said:No this is news to me .I would have thought that decling to vote would simply have continued the status quo.
They already have. BAM trained! Now go work the flight!john john said:Management will just load a training test with a completion date…. BAM your trained
Because 700 said otherwise? Seriously?cltrat said:Josh now cmon you've been told time and time again that is not the case
What about BOS? Too bad the 332 isn't to MIA.700UW said:First of all PHX isn't the hometown hub, and America West never flew the A330, that would me PMUS.
Dont let the facts get in your way, and the equipment is in PHX or on its way and rampers are being trained.
And US has widebody capable gates in PHX.
While I would vote no on a strike vote at this time thats not the same as saying I would cross the line.Jester said:CJ,
Maybe Freedom would change his vote if you allow him to move in with you during the strike? But seriously, while I respect Freedom's "No" vote (even if I disagree), I wonder if he and others would cross the line and report for work? I am sure there is some correlation between the closeness of a "Yes" vote and those willing to cross the line.
Also, you mentioned the lack of training on the AA equipment, especially the MD-80, but a fair number of PHX agents have worked the Continental and Allegiant Mad Dogs, so I don't see that as a real issue. Computer and software issues are another matter to be sure. Did I hear correctly that the lead with the lowest seniority has the responsibility of the A330 flights as no one else wanted the hassle, so it defaulted to that poor soul? What could go wrong when the least experienced lead is responsible for an aircraft with completely different means to load, push, and operate?