There is a huge difference between misinterpreting, and misrepresenting for political purposes! Tim was using this language as tool in his campaign in an attempt to portray the Leadership as dishonest, and inept. He further accused them of not revealing the SCS scenario to the Membership as being an obstacle to Section 6.
700, myself, and others pointed out the likelihood of arbitration, but Tim insisted it was non-negotiable, and non-applicable, thus resulting in NO leverage in Section Six talks. His argument was for political reasons, and we are now on the precipice of an agreement WITHOUT SCS being an issue!
