What's new

2014 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bill Brasky said:
You want to hear the funny part?  When USAPA sues the company and APA the west will paying their part of the legal fees or be fired.  I laugh my ass off every time I think about it.
Again, you delusional fking idiot. USCABA is GONE. No money, no standing, NO authority what so ever. Toast, nada, Zip, zilch, kaput, zero, Courtney, Borman, fat, fukc, loser, unemployable, piece, of, Schitt, accepts, recall, to, the, most, pathetic, loser, airline, ever, nothing, nowhere, no how, total, emptiness, gone, FAILED.

Understand cupcake?
 
prechilill said:
How much longer until USAPA gets put to rest?  I'm thinking six weeks.
Are you seriously going to begin to time anything after all the other misfires?
 
Res Judicata said:
Again, you delusional fking idiot. USCABA is GONE. No money, no standing, NO authority what so ever. Toast, nada, Zip, zilch, kaput, zero, Courtney, Borman, fat, fukc, loser, unemployable, piece, of, Schitt, accepts, recall, to, the, most, pathetic, loser, airline, ever, nothing, nowhere, no how, total, emptiness, gone, FAILED.
Understand cupcake?
The FBI got the lying and anger issues all spot on.
 
Something I find interesting is that we have had two deadlines for the protocol agreement come and go. And we now read the USAPA update saying an impasse has occurred (not surprising). But we have heard NOTHING officially from the APA. Why are they not keeping their pilots updated? 
 
Just curious... 
 
algflyr said:
Something I find interesting is that we have had two deadlines for the protocol agreement come and go. And we now read the USAPA update saying an impasse has occurred (not surprising). But we have heard NOTHING officially from the APA. Why are they not keeping their pilots updated? 
 
Just curious... 
Because the APA and AA pilots don't care much about this impasse, it has zero bearing on them.  Ustupid, different story.
 
That's a good question. From the ones I know, they are overall better informed than we are and not as concerned.

Bean
 
algflyr said:
Something I find interesting is that we have had two deadlines for the protocol agreement come and go. And we now read the USAPA update saying an impasse has occurred (not surprising). But we have heard NOTHING officially from the APA. Why are they not keeping their pilots updated? 
 
Just curious...
Because they know USCABA is nothing but a gnat spinning around a useless pile of Schitt? Maybe they don't clog email accounts with worthless Schitt like there own "bereavement"?
 
prechilill said:
Because the APA and AA pilots don't care much about this impasse, it has zero bearing on them.  Ustupid, different story.
Your premature celebrations and countdowns are legendary on this forum.  
 
Prechill:  But at least we will be running off the cliff in Nic order!  LOL
Freighterguynow said:
Mighty warriors of Sparta to the front and CHARGE !
 
I had the same comical image from that. Oh Goody! Nic says we get to jump off the cliff first! Prepare "you'se" selves soldiers! This is Sparta! Knights and dire wolves to the front! BANZAI!!!...Arrrgh! Methinks I'll just sit back and watch instead. 😉
 
Res Judicata said:
Because they know USCABA is nothing but a gnat spinning around a useless pile of Schitt? Maybe they don't clog email accounts with worthless Schitt like there own "bereavement"?
nic decision was May 2007.  In a few months it will be May 2014.  Do you sense a pattern of anniversaries passing by of a failed alpa arbitration?  Are you still waiting for the damages trial?
 
Is it unusual for american pilots attempting to test the will of other pilot groups they merge with?  They will not ever want to get involved in an arbitration.  Give them time to blink, it has only been a few hours since their attempt.
 
Beancounter said:
That's a good question. From the ones I know, they are overall better informed than we are and not as concerned.

Bean
They are out of their comfort area now, give them time to be concerned about the wall  they encountered. 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top