dca319 said:I'm sorry, what? Fell asleep reading that one.
Likely from "you'se" adoptive mommy brushing your persian pussycat hair, as you're safely spouting off online...? 😉
Thanks for the always predictable laughs Move2CLT/"dca".
dca319 said:I'm sorry, what? Fell asleep reading that one.
Do us a favor Kev. Google William Wilder in conjunction with McCaskill Bond.Metroyet said:Relax. You'll be able to sue the APA when this is all over. You know, try to un-explode the bomb. After watching you complete idiots fumble the ball time and time again, I'm guessing no one at the APA is losing any sleep over your geriatric group of failures however.
you probably won't read anything about a judge turning McCaskill Bond as she sees fit either. That law will be followed one way or anotherClaxon said:Do us a favor Kev. Google William Wilder in conjunction with McCaskill Bond.
Then get back to us. Maybe you and the APA will get an education about who put the entire bill together. Hint, you won't see Marty Harper mentioned, nor Eric Ferguson.
No Roghair mentioned either.
Waiting for west pilots to roll out Marty against Wilder. As well as the APA.cltrat said:you probably won't read anything about a judge turning McCaskill Bond as she sees fit either. That law will be followed one way or another
Claxon said:Is Ferguson and Leonidas advising the APA?
Horner, ferguson Simmons and Koontz started the entire Leonidas Ponzi scheme based on total misunderstanding of labor law. Marty profited from their ignorance.EastUS1 said:One could only wish...
dca319 said:Good morning to you as well little sunshine. Once your finish you'se glass of "hair of the dog", we need to set up and LLC for AOX.
How much should I put you down for to start? Claxon, you in?
Phoenix said:You seem persuaded that the West will participate in MB arbitration. Answer me this...
No arbitration can start, much less finish, apart from the arbitrating parties submitting themselves to the terms or arbitration. And by the way, the arbitrator submits to the terms as well....
Q1: The terms of MB arbitration are stipulated by Statute. If a party to the arbitration desires to stipulate terms other than the statute, what would be required to do so?
Q2: Or in the alternative, if a party to the arbitration preferred to limit the terms of arbitration to the Statute without modification what would be required?
Hint: A1: A supplemental agreement between all parties.
A2: Nothing.
Which is easier?
Metroyet said:The easier thing is to completely remove the opposing party. ....
Leader of a group that held off a majority for 8 years - I wouldn't wish that Persian #1.EastUS1 said:
One could only wish...
I think the APA and company made it clear they'll be giving a seat to the west.Phoenix said:
P.P.P.S. If anyone wants to entitle the West Pilots to participate, all arbitration parties will have to agree to stipulate an exception to the statute. <<------------ This is your clue. 😉
He may be nuts but he's our nuts. Clacon is Persian #3 in the newly formed AOX.Monkee said:
The fun part is, you only need to make one posting to Clax to send him off in an addled frenzy, resulting in another 10 posts of comedy gold from him. You have him trained like Pavlov's dog.
Woops! Persian #1 thinks I'm a cat now. Back on the sauce he is.EastUS1 said:
Likely from "you'se" adoptive mommy brushing your persian pussycat hair, as you're safely spouting off online...? 😉
Thanks for the always predictable laughs Move2CLT/"dca".
dca319 said:Woops! Persian #1 thinks I'm a cat now. Back on the sauce he is.
dca319 said:Woops! Persian #1 thinks I'm a cat now.