What's new

2014 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Phoenix said:
 
 
The self-proclaimed "players" have cleansed someone who believes in DOH?    😉   Duh...
Only a complete moron would continue with a position that an arbitrator has made abundantly clear that he is not buying into. I do agree that it's a good place to start however.
 
Metroyet said:
Illegal is illegal. Take the bird in hand, and sue for the obvious DFR later. The 9th required a ratified contract to proceed. You got one. Did you really think you were going to be able to play stupid with some kind of shell game and slip DOH past anyone's attention? Btw, the "terms" of the MOU as explained to the West by their own legal counsel turned out to be a bald faced lie. See. That's a problem. He could have taken the stand to explain but thought it was smarter to not do that. Kinda suspicious, no?
Unbelievable stupidity. Leonidas lawyers taking you for a ride. Marty pockets millions.
 
Ponzi Schemer Busted
 
 
A Statesville man faces a federal indictment alleging that he was the operator of a $44 million Ponzi scheme that defrauded more than 200 investors, the U.S. Attorney’s Office announced Thursday.

Daniel H. Williford, 55, was indicted on one count each of securities fraud and wire fraud and five counts of money laundering, said Anne M. Tompkins, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina. The federal grand jury returned the indictments on Wednesday.

The indictment also includes a forfeiture allegation seeking a money judgment in the amount of $44 million, Tompkins said.
“For years, Daniel Williford swindled hundreds of people, including his own co-workers, out of their hard-earned money," John A. Strong, special agent in charge of the FBI in North Carolina, said in a press release. "While most people struggle to afford college, he paid those expenses using cash from his investors. Now he will be held accountable for his actions because of the agents and prosecutors who worked so diligently to bring him to justice."

According to allegations contained in the indictment, from January 2007 through July 2013, Williford induced more than 200 investors in Charlotte and elsewhere to invest more than $44 million by promising his victims their money would be invested in wireless Internet equipment, Internet towers and other facilities and companies.

Instead of investing the money, the indictment alleges, Williford used it to run a Ponzi-style scheme and to fund his personal lifestyle. According to the indictment, during the course of the fraud, Williford invested only $7.7 million of the victims’ money. The indictment alleges that Williford used approximately $32 million of the investor’s money to cover personal expenses and to pay some of his victims' supposed “profits” on their investments. However, these payouts came from funds contributed by new investors, known as “Ponzi” payments.

Williford has been ordered by the U.S. District Court to appear on a summons for his initial appearance, which will be scheduled by the court. If convicted, Williford faces a maximum of 20 years in prison each for the securities fraud and wire fraud counts, and a maximum of 10 years imprison for each of the money laundering counts. The securities fraud count carries a maximum fine of $5 million, the wire fraud count a maximum fine of $250,000, and each of the money laundering counts carries a maximum fine of $250,000 or twice the amount of criminally derived proceeds.

The FBI investigated the case. The prosecution is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kurt Meyers of the Western District of North Carolina.
 
A320 Driver said:
Only a complete moron would continue with a position that an arbitrator has made abundantly clear that he is not buying into. I do agree that it's a good place to start however.
 
 
What adjective would you ascribe to someone who appoints their most vocal advocate and dubious donations collector to be on the ballot certification committee in a referendum calling for their own recall?  
 
Phoenix said:
 
 
What adjective would you ascribe to someone who appoints their most vocal advocate and dubious donations collector to be on the ballot certification committee in a referendum calling for their own recall?  
Cleary-esque?
 
Cleary-ish?
 
Cleary-like?
 
MUTATIS MUTANDIS said:
Your correct because the ones  mentioned are masters of backroom deals!
Name one! 
 
I do have to give you credit, you and a few others have sold out the entire pilot group (East & West), and yet you have many of them thanking you for it.  That is a very professional BS job.  But I have no doubt that when the damage is over and the lawsuits start.  Your groups violation of the RLA among other things will land some hefty fines on some of you, and with a little luck maybe even a jail sentence. 
 
traderjake said:
Minus 1 
 
I see Williford reads this web board.  😀
He'll have plenty of time to read anything.  USAPA was about to S29 him but the company beat him to it.
 
Wonder if Anderson was talking about this guy along with himself in his letter?
 
Metroyet said:
Illegal is illegal. .....Kinda suspicious, no?
 
Suspicious....?
 
Implicit Assumption 101:
 
Implicit assumptions are not adequate to carry the burden of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prevail.  Many facts, innuendo, and assumptions can seem to pile up yet the burden of proof may still not be reached, despite extremely strong suspicions that would otherwise suggest that the plaintiff would presumably prevail.... For example, many people had strong suspicions that "Teflon Bill" engaged in some activities that would have him successfully impeached.... i.e. it was implicitly assumed that a "blue dress" was very suspicious.  
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top