nycbusdriver said:
For the life of me, I can't figure out why you think USAPA will be gone and AOL will still be here. USAPA doesn't disappear just because it is no longer the CBA. It will be here for as long as it has money and support. USAPA existed months before it became the CBA and does not depend on being the bargaining agent to exist any more than does AOL.
Do you have any living grey matter in your head?
That's but one key component of west "strategy" while on "Mr. Spartan's Wild Ride" in Fantasyland and it just becomes increasingly hilarious from there.
Other necessary assumptions:
1) A line of a judge's (however bizarre) dicta magically carries far more weight than do actual Rulings and/or MB law and protocol.
2) The APA's somehow terrified of their mighty "army", and will have not the slightest concerns for any potential litigation that could come from anyone/anywhere else, and will thus; unquestionably insist on the nic, even though doing so would seriously harm their own people in any then "relative" arbitration process.
3) The nic is still magically "viable", as the supposedly only possible list, even though the MOU which supercedes all previous contractual agreements says, states or even hints nothing of the kind, and in fact mentions "lists" plural, as actually being in effect.
4) Most laughably; that it's apparently been the life-long, secret dream of the APA to embrace and exult AWA's "spartans", and eagerly move them up the seniority/attrition/etc ladder above even their own people, as expeditiously as can be done.
😉
The list continues on from there, but some business awaits, and I've little doubt a few mighty "spartans" are now ready to again beat their "shields" a bit more.
😉