cactusboy53 said:
Dear 3.14159265359 (Pi....get it? 😀 ):
We’re going to do some SIMPLE math today, and return to new words tomorrow. Get your scratch pad out and follow along, please.
First of all, there was at first a “comprehensive proposal” in May of 2008 with the Joint Contract Bargaining Agreement quite nearly done. This proposal included wages. This proposal was NOT the company’s final offer (known as the “Kirby Proposal”).
So, first of all the US Air pilots (using NB Captain pay) was making $125 an hour, while the AWA NB Captain was making $142 an hour. A US Air NB Captain working 85 hours a month would earn only $10,625.00 a month, and $127,500.00 a year.
The Kirby proposal offered 3% above the AWA $142 an hour for NB (at a minimum), BUT in court testimony a company official stated that they were prepared to go as high as 10% above that figure for the beginning point in 2008.
Based on court testimony, it is estimated that the wage of a US Airways NB Captain could have been as high as $162.36 an hour (starting out at $156.04 in Jan. 2008 – that’s a 24.8% INCREASE in wage!). That means that same US Airways NB Captain (using an 85 hour work month as a benchmark) would earn $807,044.00 over the course of 5 years (Jan. 2008 through Dec. 2012) vs. $637,500.00.
That is a LOSS of nearly $170,000.00 in five years! Not to mention the gain of FULL PAY CANCELLATION and FULL PAY DEADHEAD. Not to mention scheduling improvements. Not to mention better vacation accrual / time.
So……$807,044.00 will ALWAYS be MORE than $637,500.00. Further, you will NEVER recover those funds that were frittered away by USAPA and its ridiculous claims to get a “industry leading contract” with the “gold standard” of “date-of-hire”.
That concludes today's SIMPLE math lesson for today. Join us tomorrow when we return to learning new words & terms!
CB53
So, did you not read my post or the transcripts?
Math is not your problem, it's reality. I asked you if you claimed that we could have been at our current rates years ago. Even so, you can't even reply without using "maybe", "possible" etc.
Here are a few highlights from John Boy's testimony:
starting on page 233 1/08/2016 transcript:
"But you can see the 12-year pay rate was
146.10. So Mr. Kirby didn't quite make his buck 50
promise to me. So we can see where this was going, so to speak."
"Q. Now, again, this was the Company's first
proposal.
Were there subsequent negotiations over economics following the carrier proposal?
A. No. We could never get back to present the Company with a comprehensive counterproposal
because the East withdraw from joint negotiations"
" Q. I want to leap forward from that spring of -- spring and summer of 2007 towards the end of
2007 the beginning of 2008.
Now, I understand, and so there's no
misunderstanding by the Panel, that neither Kirby. Now, I understand, and so there's no
misunderstanding by the Panel, that neither Kirby plus 4 nor Kirby plus 7 was, in fact, ever proposed
2 by the Company; correct?
A.
No. It was not -- the Kirby was the 4 proposal by the Company. My guess is we would have come in with Kirby plus 10 as our counterproposal. And then hopefully settle somewhere in the middle, somewhere,8 and in that range, had we been able to get back to
the table."
Hopefully ask. What cb takes a fact.
Who were you calling a Maroon? Go back to living your life in the cartoons.