What's new

Another School Massacre

Didn't know stem cell research was considered a catastrophe !


Don't like playing "Where's Waldo" !


The last one you should follow, would be Kerry !
From Swift Vets:


"John Kerry's service in Vietnam lasted 4 months and 12 days, beginning in November 1968 when he reported to Cam Ranh Bay for a month of training. His abbreviated combat tour ended shortly after he requested a transfer out of Vietnam on March 17, 1969, citing Navy instruction 1300.39 permitting personnel with three Purple Hearts to request reassignment. So far as we are able to determine, Kerry was the only Swift sailor ever to leave Vietnam without completing the standard one-year tour of duty, other than those who were seriously wounded or killed.
It is clear that at least one of Kerry's Purple Heart awards was the result of his own negligence, not enemy fire, and that Kerry went to unusual lengths to obtain the award after being turned down by his own commanding officer.
John Kerry has long insisted that using the three-injury loophole to leave combat early was his own idea, but Kerry's fellow Swift officer Thomas Wright, who served on occasion as the OIC (Officer in Charge) of Kerry's boat group, contradicts that claim. Wright reports that he "had a lot of trouble getting Kerry to follow orders," and that those who worked with Kerry found him "oriented towards his personal, rather than unit goals and objectives." He therefore requested that Kerry be removed from his boat group. After John Kerry qualified for his third Purple Heart, Thomas Wright and two fellow officers informed him of the obscure regulation, and told him to go home. Wright concluded, "We knew how the system worked and we didn’t want him in Coastal Division 11."
Constructing a complete picture of Kerry's service is difficult due to gaps in the Naval records provided by the Kerry campaign. These gaps include missing and incomplete fitness reports, missing medical records and missing records related to his medal awards.
For this reason we call upon Senator Kerry to authorize complete access to all his military records by filing a standard Form 180, a simple two-page release form.
Swift Vets and POWs for Truth is in the process of researching John Kerry's time in Vietnam by conducting interviews with eyewitnesses to his activities, and we plan to add material to this section over the next several weeks as it becomes available. We will report the true circumstances of Kerry's medal awards and injuries, describe other controversial missions, and provide in-depth analysis of his fitness reports." http://www.swiftvets...=KerryinVietnam
.
http://www.swiftvets...=KerryinVietnam
His own brethren, couldn't wait to get rid of him !


Just spit it out, will you ! "Cradle-to-Grave" government !

The swiftboaters were discredited a long time ago.

http://www.factcheck.org/republican-funded_group_attacks_kerrys_war_record.html

Kerry's length of service was a whole longer than GWB, draft dodger, and I've never seen you make a stink about that.
 
61714_565161910162244_1259487812_n.jpg
 
Be interesting to see what type pistol it was. Based on what happened it was probably one of those single action semi-autos that have to be cocked and carried on 'safe'. You can't pull the trigger to start the fire sequence which would be a double action similar to a revolver but still semi auto.They usually come in .32 or .380 and are low end quality.
Most likely the safety tripped off in his pocket, He's lucky. I wouldn't own one if you gave it to me.
 
Be interesting to see what type pistol it was. Based on what happened it was probably one of those single action semi-autos that have to be cocked and carried on 'safe'. You can't pull the trigger to start the fire sequence which would be a double action similar to a revolver but still semi auto.They usually come in .32 or .380 and are low end quality.
Most likely the safety tripped off in his pocket, He's lucky. I wouldn't own one if you gave it to me.

But he...and it...were legal. And the wifey missed dessert because of it. I wonder if he got any nookie that night.
 
You are right...........but did he intentionally kill and massacre?
No...but he didn't have the brains that God gave a goose, yet he was able not only to own a gun, but to CARRY it in public.
 
No...but he didn't have the brains that God gave a goose, yet he was able not only to own a gun, but to CARRY it in public.

I wasn't aware Geese were capable of using firearms.
KC, they eliminate firearms tomorrow, bludgeoning, maiming, knives, hatchets etc will be the weapons of choice and the homicide rate will still be up there.

FBI stat I think says next weapon of choice for killing is the baseball bat.

Its not the weapon, its the people whether or not they have access to firearms, they still tend to get the job done, one way or another, man is such a devious interesting creature.
 
I wasn't aware Geese were capable of using firearms.
KC, they eliminate firearms tomorrow, bludgeoning, maiming, knives, hatchets etc will be the weapons of choice and the homicide rate will still be up there.

FBI stat I think says next weapon of choice for killing is the baseball bat.

Its not the weapon, its the people whether or not they have access to firearms, they still tend to get the job done, one way or another, man is such a devious interesting creature.

And I've never advocated banning guns. Making the tougher to get? Yes. Making sure the purchaser is #### sane? Yes. Banning semiautomatic weapons who sole purpose is to kill people? Yes. Keep your pistol. Keep your hunting rifle. Keep your shotgun. But the minute anyone suggests that we ban guns that were designed to kill as many PEOPLE in as short a time as possible, we are met with some constitutional bullshit and the argument that if a gang of 40 theives was roaming your neighborhood one night, you would NEEd that 100 shot magazine to protect your home.
 
And I've never advocated banning guns. Making the tougher to get? Yes. Making sure the purchaser is #### sane? Yes. Banning semiautomatic weapons who sole purpose is to kill people? Yes. Keep your pistol. Keep your hunting rifle. Keep your shotgun. But the minute anyone suggests that we ban guns that were designed to kill as many PEOPLE in as short a time as possible, we are met with some constitutional bullshit and the argument that if a gang of 40 theives was roaming your neighborhood one night, you would NEEd that 100 shot magazine to protect your home.

But many rifles, shotguns and handguns are semi-auto's.
100 shot I agree with that but wimping it down to a revolver capacity is boosheet.
In a high adrenaline survival situation you may need some capacity.
 
But many rifles, shotguns and handguns are semi-auto's.
100 shot I agree with that but wimping it down to a revolver capacity is boosheet.
In a high adrenaline survival situation you may need some capacity.

I haven't needed a single shot in 56 and a half years. My grandfather never needed a single shot in 86 years. My dad never needed a single shot in 76 years. I guess it's in the genes.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top