What's new

April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
They didn't hint at anything. They said that there was an injunction. Judge Lane is a smart man. I guess he didn't want to get wrapped up in this BS. Sounds like he thinks it will be bounced out of court in short order anyway.

I think by "injunction" they meant that AOL's lawyers would have to stipulate that they would not interfere in any way with the merger. I guess this takes the wind out of Marty's sails.

An "injunction" is a court order. The court ordered nothing sp this is our union's attempt to save face. This looks to be a gentlemen's agreement. The only court action was denying USAPAs request.
 
No one was enjoined and I'm curious ad to why USAPA would even hint at it. It sounds like they're writing up an understanding and signing it. Doesn't sound like a loss. The only denial I saw was the request to move to NY.
Enjoin: To legally prohibit or restrain by INJUNCTION. Blacks Law Dictionary, Ninth ed. "...there was a necessity to enjoin Leonidas and its affiliates from interfering with the merger between US Airways and American Airlines." Hey, can you AwFOL guys get your own dictionary so I don't have to be your grammar teacher? I got Black's on my Ipad. Maybe you should too.
 
Excellent news for the West Pilots from the NY BK Court this morning. We are preparing an update that will be published sometime later today as we are still processing the information received from our attorneys (actually still on a conference call with the attorneys). Basically, Judge Lane will issue an Order soon to dismiss usapa's NY BK action with prejudice.

Thanks for your patience as we prepare the update.

G.
You lost. SYIC.
 
An "injunction" is a court order. The court ordered nothing sp this is our union's attempt to save face. This looks to be a gentlemen's agreement. The only court action was denying USAPAs request.
When a court orders you to do something, it's hardly a "gentleman's agreement". Nobody would confuse AOL, it's lawyers or members for "gentlemen".

Better send out another update. Marty will need more cash to keep his charade going. Sort of like pretending to be from the East when you are really a westie.
 
Lol- jeez some of you east guys are complete idiots if you can't see the handwriting on the wall. You are a danger to the industry, to Parker and the American pilots. The APA is marginalizing Usapa because you all are a bunch of idiots. Another dismissal with prejudice and out west the company supports AOL in expediting that case in Arizona. It's January '45 and the Reich is surrounded- it's only a matter of time now.
You lost. SYIC.
 
Enjoin: To legally prohibit or restrain by INJUNCTION. Blacks Law Dictionary, Ninth ed. "...there was a necessity to enjoin Leonidas and its affiliates from interfering with the merger between US Airways and American Airlines." Hey, can you AwFOL guys get your own dictionary so I don't have to be your grammar teacher? I got Black's on my Ipad. Maybe you should too.

Take it easy on them. They are going to lose the donations if they don't spin the loss correctly. Marty stepped on his crank again, there is no leverage whatsoever with AMR from Leonidas. In fact they were politely shown the door.
 
An "injunction" is a court order. The court ordered nothing sp this is our union's attempt to save face. This looks to be a gentlemen's agreement. The only court action was denying USAPAs request.
So Marty being shown the door with the seniority attempt means nothing? Delusional
 
Can we expect to see another update from usapa complaining about yet another judge that does not understand the law?

Damn another loss and waste of money by the legal brain trust called usapa.

Now that usapa has been #### slapped again they will have time to address the Arizona case. Pucker up buttercups.
You lost. SYIC.
 
With the NY case dismissed. Usapa will have plenty of time to work on the Arizona case. No more excuses, no more delays.

No permanent injunction on the west because the case was dismissed. No transfer to NY because judge Lane refused the case, dismissed.

Not much of a victory for usapa. The west agreeing not to do anything we never intended to do. The west was never going to try and stop the corporate merger. The Arizona case will define the seniority integration (merger).

Spin all usapa wants. They lost. Judge Lane tossed usapa out of his court.
 
With the NY case dismissed. Usapa will have plenty of time to work on the Arizona case. No more excuses, no more delays.

No permanent injunction on the west because the case was dismissed. No transfer to NY because judge Lane refused the case, dismissed.

Not much of a victory for usapa. The west agreeing not to do anything we never intended to do. The west was never going to try and stop the corporate merger. The Arizona case will define the seniority integration (merger).

Spin all usapa wants. They lost. Judge Lane tossed usapa out of his court.
You lost. SYIC.
 
What am I missing? Usapa cases to stop the west is dismissed.

The west case in Arizona is going forward.

Yes we will SYIC. In Arizona.

Usapa won nothing. Can't wait for the transcripts. Who do you think will put them out first. The transparent loser union or the west pilots?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top