What's new

April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Come on now Dave, enough is enough your own group is fed up with you, the support is gone people just want to move on. It's over son. The boys and I would like to get together with your group for a little party we can all use our screen names as name tags, it should be fun.
Being the proven liar you are if you are saying that the west is fed up. Means that the support is strong.

Things must be getting desperate out east.
 
Another pilot who thinks he's smarter than a lawyer. Big shocker there. Guys like you blessed us with LOA 93.
First of all, I KNOW I'm smarter than a lot of lawyers I know. Secondly, why do YOU care about LOA 93? Sure must be fun to pretend you're someone that you aren't. You're just really bad at it. Don't give up your day job, if you really have one.
 
If, the powers that be, declared the DFR-II "ripe" tomorrow (big IF), there would still NOT be an East-West system-wide bid until such time as the ENTIRE merger is complete, which will be what......24-30 months from today. The company is not going to "shuffle" the deck until there is a completed operational and contractual merger. In the unlikely event that during this process AOL is able to get an injunction halting the agreed to "process", an adjudication "requiring" the use of the NIC, would still be required prior to doing so, which would take, how long. Let's see.... a new trial inclusive of discovery and God knows how many pre-trial motions, the inevitable appeal (regardless of who prevails) and another trip to the SCOTUS (regardless of who prevails) any way you cut it, it will be DOH for at least another 24-30 months, much longer (2 to 3+ more years after that) if the DFR-II has to wait till completion of the merger "process" prior to start.

So take a deep breath boys and girls because NOTHING is going to happen "soon"!

Personally, it doesn't appear that any of this will likely happen prior to my retirement and that of many others, in the meantime I will try to "bear-up" under the new pay rates in effect and deal with the QOL improvements afforded to me by my DOH.


seajay
 
you mean like dragging your "union" before a Federal Judge kicking and screaming?

The only "kicking and screaming" I've seen of late (make that the last nearly six years now) comes entirely from your little band of mighty "spartans". Oh! And Metro?...DO make sure not to "step on" any "claymores". 😉 Those do actually come with enscribed directions, btw = "Front Toward Enemy", and must be placed above ground to have any useful effect....not that useful effect's evidently of any concern to your bunch. 🙂 Yo "spartans"!!!
 
Good points. I just don't see how the idiot westies on here can say that anything is "ripe" when there hasn't even been a method of integration agreed to, let alone any sort of combined contract.

This is going to be bounced so fast it will make even the westies' heads spin (more than they are already).
 
Personally, it doesn't appear that any of this will likely happen prior to my retirement and that of many others, in the meantime I will try to "bear-up" under the new pay rates in effect and deal with the QOL improvements afforded to me by my DOH.

Yes. It indeed appears we've all a great deal of true suffering ahead of us. 😉 Dang those mighty "spartans"! 🙂
 
Good points. I just don't see how the idiot westies on here can say that anything is "ripe" when there hasn't even been a method of integration agreed to, let alone any sort of combined contract.

What matter mere details to the heart of a "knight" errant?...Much less any "spartans"? 🙂
 
Good points. I just don't see how the idiot westies on here can say that anything is "ripe" when there hasn't even been a method of integration agreed to, let alone any sort of combined contract.

This is going to be bounced so fast it will make even the westies' heads spin (more than they are already).
Read the NY transcripts. Every single Lawyer in the room and the Judge see this as "never going to get MORE ripe" and want an expeditious end to the matter. Every Lawyer that is except for USAPA's whom, after a lot of qualified jabber, offered agreement as well, at which point Judge Lane made a Joke at his expense and laughter ensued.,

Oh yeah, this is going nowhere alright. Are you really going to be surprised at all when the Nic is ordered fairly soon? You shouldn't be.
 
If, the powers that be, declared the DFR-II "ripe" tomorrow (big IF), there would still NOT be an East-West system-wide bid until such time as the ENTIRE merger is complete, which will be what......24-30 months from today. The company is not going to "shuffle" the deck until there is a completed operational and contractual merger. In the unlikely event that during this process AOL is able to get an injunction halting the agreed to "process", an adjudication "requiring" the use of the NIC, would still be required prior to doing so, which would take, how long. Let's see.... a new trial inclusive of discovery and God knows how many pre-trial motions, the inevitable appeal (regardless of who prevails) and another trip to the SCOTUS (regardless of who prevails) any way you cut it, it will be DOH for at least another 24-30 months, much longer (2 to 3+ more years after that) if the DFR-II has to wait till completion of the merger "process" prior to start.

So take a deep breath boys and girls because NOTHING is going to happen "soon"!

Personally, it doesn't appear that any of this will likely happen prior to my retirement and that of many others, in the meantime I will try to "bear-up" under the new pay rates in effect and deal with the QOL improvements afforded to me by my DOH.


seajay
I can assure you AOL is going to want a lot more than just the Nic being declared the new list. Your fantasy of endless delay is just a fantasy.
 
I can assure you AOL is going to want a lot more than just the Nic being declared the new list.

Hmmm...That sounds like a purely personal problem for AOL. Seriously; exactly who much cares about what the mighty AOL wants? Why should anyone at this point? If there's some double-secret-probation level of stored power and influence within AOL HQ...well...perhaps it's past time to at least crack the door of the bunker a bit, so we can all be properly awestruck and dazzled by the "light". 🙂

I can almost hear faint echoes feebly issuing forth from the bunker...."You won't even get 200 cards!"..."Send the cards, I DARE you!"..."Final and binding!..It's OVER, get used to it!"...and of course, from December of 2007: "Ho ho ho! St. Nic is coming to town!" 🙂
 
Every lawyer except usapa is saying it is ripe and only usapa is correct.

Sure dude.
Almost seven years now and no Nicolau. What is any different now? Nothing. You continue to attempt pi$$ing up ropes at Leonidas. It is what you do.
 
I can assure you AOL is going to want a lot more than just the Nic being declared the new list. Your fantasy of endless delay is just a fantasy.

I can assure you nobody takes Leonidas seriously. No courts, not AMR, certainly not the UCC.
Especially not Scott Kirby......"NO......."
 
First of all, I KNOW I'm smarter than a lot of lawyers I know. Secondly, why do YOU care about LOA 93? Sure must be fun to pretend you're someone that you aren't. You're just really bad at it. Don't give up your day job, if you really have one.

Just as I posted, we're on LOA93 because of guys like Bill - so dumb he thinks he's brilliant. Way to go Bill.
 
Read the NY transcripts. Every single Lawyer in the room and the Judge see this as "never going to get MORE ripe" and want an expeditious end to the matter. Every Lawyer that is except for USAPA's whom, after a lot of qualified jabber, offered agreement as well, at which point Judge Lane made a Joke at his expense and laughter ensued.,

Oh yeah, this is going nowhere alright. Are you really going to be surprised at all when the Nic is ordered fairly soon? You shouldn't be.
Then "every single lawyer" in the room is sadly mistaken. Even if it were ripe, which it isn't, it would only mean that AOL could then BEGIN ANOTHER lawsuit for a DFR. It wouldn't mean that they would win anything.

That quote that Metro put up a while ago only emphasized that there are two separate entities here, not one, as AOL insists in their continued ignorant rhetoric. The Judge was actually siding with USAPA, not AOL on that count.

You guys are losers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top