The "competent" lawyers stated the basis of the West's particular type of standing, all by themselves. You still haven't read it enough times.
Do you know the question?
So in your feeble mind simply repeating the complain qualifies your lawyer as clever and subtly calling the west lawyer incompetent?
What you think that the judge is incompetent too because she missed it the first time in the original complaint?
How about this from the court?
III. Motion to Certify Class
The West Pilots have moved to certify a class and US Airways has filed notice that
it agrees certification is appropriate. (Doc. 11, 40). The Court stayed briefing on this issue
pending resolution of the other motions. (Doc. 43). The class certification motion must now
be briefed, but USAPA should consider whether it is wise to oppose the motion. In the
previous litigation, USAPA vigorously opposed a class certification motion but that
opposition was not well-reasoned. (CV-10-1570, Doc. 111). Thus, the order granting
certification was straightforward. (CV-10-1570, Doc. 125). Absent substantially better
arguments than what it presented last time, USAPA should consider consenting to
certification.
Did you miss the substantially better argument part? I would say that the court telling usapa failed in their filings would be more devastating than repeating a statement.