snapthis
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 4,236
- Reaction score
- 6,907
It's a good thing those folks couldn't see his behavior at the crew news sessions.
What kind of behavior? Taking a stand against tyranny?
It's a good thing those folks couldn't see his behavior at the crew news sessions.
What kind of behavior? Taking a stand against tyranny?
You haven't seen them? You can take a stand without acting that way. I have no problem with you guys standing up for what you believe in, if you do it in an appropriate manner. I cannot believe that Mr. Parker has stood up there and let guys say what they have said, particularly calling managers that are in the room "scumbags." Glad they are public, the childish youtube videos are bad enough.
I was as equally as taken back by the "preacher" lecturing Parker. You claimed he was a friend of yours. I was embarrassed for you. I also remember Cleary jumping Parker when he was trying to speak. Rude and disrespectful as well.
The Addington plaintiffs testified that they wouldn't have voted for it.
No, I claimed that the PIC guy was a friend of mine. I don't agree with everything he has said, but at least he is always respectful. Cleary got his rear handed to him and was an embarrassment. I don't know the guy that brought religion into it.
Often guys at the crew news sessions are embarrassing, but there is a marked difference in the tone between east and west.
Funny that you don't acknowledge Gay's actions, but shift to the east guys.
What about my question?
BTW, one of the most common east crew news attendees with questions, GS instructor George, just passed away. RIP George.
So sorry to hear about George. I always enjoyed talking to him in ground school. He will be missed by all.BTW, one of the most common east crew news attendees with questions, GS instructor George, just passed away. RIP George.
First, sorry to hear the news about George and condolences to those of you who knew him.
Second, I did not see your qusetion until just now since I was writing a message. I don't think our vote would have mattered so the question is moot. You hold the 2/3 majority and have made the rules. The only way I get a vote is through supporting our legal defense.
That is not an answer.
Under the TA, when we were ALPA, each MEC would have had to ratify a JCBA. If you had a bad SLI and the contract was not good enough to overcome it, you would have had been able to vote no on the JCBA and block the SLI, just like we did.