I actually have answered this several times. What is the title of the document your group ratified? Who is it binding upon? The APA's Q&A directly mirrors the same material the company mailed to your home PRIOR to the vote. You were told in no uncertain terms that the named entities regarded that MOU as a Contingent CBA before voting started. Did the APA just pull that out of their ass? They're no USAPA you know...they don't do that.
I hasten to add that every entity in court ....except for USAPA is flatly telling the Judge, "oh yes, this is the CBA". She listened to Siegle when he said..."there wll not be any more negotiations, this is the CBA" Now, if that fact bunches up your panties too bad.
I am sorry to interrupt you. The USAPA legal office is trying to decide where to file the following court order;
" US Airline
Pilots Association’s seniority proposal does not breach its duty of fair representation
provided it is supported by a legitimate union purpose. This judgment is binding on the
following class: “All pilots employed by US Airways in September 2008 who were on the
America West seniority list on September 20, 2005.”
"IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
US Airways, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Don Addington, et al.,
Defendants.
))))))))))
No. CV-10-01570-PHX-ROS
AMENDED JUDGMENT
(to add description of class)
Pursuant to the Court’s resolution of the motions for summary judgment,
IT IS ORDERED Counts I and III of the complaint are dismissed and judgment is
entered in favor of US Airline Pilots Association on Count II of the complaint. US Airline
Pilots Association’s seniority proposal does not breach its duty of fair representation
provided it is supported by a legitimate union purpose. This judgment is binding on the
following class: “All pilots employed by US Airways in September 2008 who were on the
America West seniority list on September 20, 2005.”
DATED this 4th day of December, 2012.
Judge Silver"