usabusdriver
Advanced
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2007
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 113
Control panel, click,
Ignore setting, click
Hey look theres Claxon!
EastUS1, click
Ahhhhh.
Good start. You left out one other essential one though.
MUTATIS MUTANDIS
Control panel, click,
Ignore setting, click
Hey look theres Claxon!
EastUS1, click
Ahhhhh.
Oh my, Is that the Star Spangled Banner I hear playing in the back ground?
Thats all the arbitrator of our list will use...
Get used to it.
BTW, you're welcome for the giant pay raise. 🙂
Well, the East feels they lost the first arbitration so now they're gunning for best two out of three. If that doesn't work for them they will revert to the classic "paper scissors rock" contest on a yet to be named elementary school playground. Because, they are men of genius...
The only trigger for a contract had to do with the merger. Neither union had all that much sway. Absent a merger neither side would have a contract nor would they have one for years or perhaps decades except for the one that would have been crammed down on the AAmerikkan pilots.Never said it did. It came courtesy of APA. What part did USAPA play? Didn't they run to the judge crying about not being included in negotiation? BTW, as a dues paying member at APA, a portion of my dues made this possible for you. That eats at you doesn't it? 😛
What has USAPA done for you? You a bus driver at a buck twenty five an hour?
Oh yea,
You're welcome!
[font=Arial"]AAviator is yet another (in a long line of West posers) jerk coming here just to stir the pot. Too many familiar phrases and the stench of some of our old flame-baiters that have come and gone here.[/font]
[font=Arial"]There is no logical reason for an American pilot, unless they have a direct tie to AWA, to come here and try and introduce the attitudes (from both East and West) into the mix with our upcoming APA merger.[/font]
[font=Arial"]There is a VERY good chance most of the APA/USAPA seniority issues will be solved without arbitration. Despite Prechilli’s special trips to the airport and ensuing fantasy conversations with West supporting AA guys, I can tell you without a doubt (at the levels of involvement where it counts) this is in fact the goal of our upcoming talks.[/font]
[font=Arial"]I strongly suggest simply ignoring AAviator. The few that pop on here and respond to him/her without reading "its" body of work are starting to make me cringe. They are being played. Don't waste your time or energy on this "clown." I won't be.[/font]
[font=Arial"]"Clown." Where have I heard that before? (other than in the 3[sup]rd[/sup] grade, but I digress…..)[/font]
[font=Arial"]Greeter[/font]
Bob, APA turned down LBFO 1 as its known to approve LBFO 2 a short while later. The LCC angle added 87 million?/yr to the pot. We had a very good deal absent the LCC merger. In fact, in the history of airline bankruptcies, APA and the AA pilots hit this one out of the park. Pension was frozen and converted to a 14% DC equivalent.The only trigger for a contract had to do with the merger. Neither union had all that much sway. Absent a merger neither side would have a contract nor would they have one for years or perhaps decades except for the one that would have been crammed down on the AAmerikkan pilots.
All the best,
Bob of the Belarus
[font=Arial"]AAviator is yet another (in a long line of West posers) jerk coming here just to stir the pot. Too many familiar phrases and the stench of some of our old flame-baiters that have come and gone here.[/font]
[font=Arial"]There is no logical reason for an American pilot, unless they have a direct tie to AWA, to come here and try and introduce the attitudes (from both East and West) into the mix with our upcoming APA merger.[/font]
[font=Arial"]There is a VERY good chance most of the APA/USAPA seniority issues will be solved without arbitration. Despite Prechilli’s special trips to the airport and ensuing fantasy conversations with West supporting AA guys, I can tell you without a doubt (at the levels of involvement where it counts) this is in fact the goal of our upcoming talks.[/font]
[font=Arial"]I strongly suggest simply ignoring AAviator. The few that pop on here and respond to him/her without reading "its" body of work are starting to make me cringe. They are being played. Don't waste your time or energy on this "clown." I won't be.[/font]
[font=Arial"]"Clown." Where have I heard that before? (other than in the 3[sup]rd[/sup] grade, but I digress…..)[/font]
[font=Arial"]Greeter[/font]
I guess that's what happens when you don't bring much to the merger.
Sure, it's valid. All we need is a ratification vote with the Nic imbeded in Section 22 and part of an LCC only JCBA. But we better hurry.
If memory serves, all of ours were recalled when the fan became obstructed with manure back in '07.
AWA was growing at 15%, three consecutive quarters of profit. Useless air two weeks from liquidation..... but I digress.
)I don't care who AAviator is. This forum is populated by anonymous posters (except for the few who have disclosed their identity). Don't get me started on USAPA's failure to establish a website where no one hides behind avatars. If a post piques my interest then I respond to it. The poster could be the seventh iteration of Joey Butafucco for all I care. USAPA had the chance to have a forum exclusively for our pilots where these issues could be hashed out with moderator oversight and without anonymity. This is the consequence of not doing so. In that regard, ALPA did better and hopefully APA will also.
I'm encouraged to hear that mutual negotiations will be given serious effort.