What's new

AWA going to blue backers

I have a question EAST? Why should we pay for your committee's bad decisions. This reminds me so much of the guy who goes to the casino. He knows that he really doesn't have the money to lose but bets anyway. When he loses he begins to beg for his money back as he really didn't mean to place a bet. When that fails he threatens to never return to that casino and tell everyone who will listen they don't play fair because they won't give him back the money he lost!!! Interestingly the casino boss tells the player not to bet on this number because it will NEVER come up!! The player feels he is smarter and wiser than the casino boss and bets it anyway.

Tell me East, whose fault is it that the player bet this way after being told not too??
If the casino makes a mistake or error in judgment by serving him too much liquor or the cards were purposely stacked against him or the player was a senile 85 year old man trying to make rational decisions, the casino would be liable.
 
If the casino makes a mistake or error in judgment by serving him too much liquor or the cards were purposely stacked against him or the player was a senile old man trying to make those important decisions, the casino would be liable.


Ok but the bettor choose to drink, he also saw the card machine and auto shuffle, had and opportunity to speak with the dealer prior and had a choice of several other dealers but still sat down at this table and made the bet anyway.

At what point does our bettor accept responsibility for his actions and stops blameing others for what he did??
 
Ok but the bettor choose to drink, he also saw the card machine and auto shuffle, had and opportunity to speak with the dealer prior and had a choice of several other dealers but still sat down at this table and made the bet anyway.

At what point does our bettor accept responsibility for his actions and stops blameing others for what he did??

When the lawsuits are finally settled.
 
Ok but the bettor choose to drink, he also saw the card machine and auto shuffle, had and opportunity to speak with the dealer prior and had a choice of several other dealers but still sat down at this table and made the bet anyway.

At what point does our bettor accept responsibility for his actions and stops blameing others for what he did??
Seems to me that if he believed in his case he wouldn't rest until the US Supreme Court made a decision on it.
 
Ok but the bettor choose to drink, he also saw the card machine and auto shuffle, had and opportunity to speak with the dealer prior and had a choice of several other dealers but still sat down at this table and made the bet anyway.

At what point does our bettor accept responsibility for his actions and stops blameing others for what he did??


Sigh...is EVERYONE at AWA this "confused"? :lol:

Let me see if I have this "straight":

1) "Seniority" should properly be established via some casino wagering.

2)..After #1 above...there's little sense in attempting rational discourse in any form.

3) Ok...you're apparently just full-blown insane :lol:

Before you get too frisky with the casino wagering...Add within the confines of my particular "How it should be" fantasyland: I'm still fine for seniority determination via aerial combat(that would take care of most ALL of you AWA "pilots" immediately)../swords/pistols/whatever....and I'm fully laughing my ### off at your continual attempts to justify what you actually, and quite clearly, fully know to be "Wrong" on so many levels that it seemingly forces you into interminable/unending postings to rather pathetically try and justify your sorry BS.

You want my younger Bro's/Sister's seat?..like that of men who've done serious service to the USA at the risk of their lives, while you were jerking around flying 30 degree banks( Oh Momma😉 at Mesa/whatever TF?..and pretending to be, and arrogantly even calling yourself a "Pilot"?...like those who've endured serious corporate BS for DECADES?

="From my Cold, Dead Hands" Edited by moderator.
The use of the word you used could be considered a personal attack.
 
....and I'm fully laughing my ### off at your continual attempts to justify what you actually, and quite clearly, fully know to be "Wrong" on so many levels that it seemingly forces you into interminable/unending postings to rather pathetically try and justify your sorry BS.
This is what an East pilot thinks about his/her side of this debate and guess what?

This is what a West pilot thinks about his/her side of this debate.

Round and round we go........
 
I think we just really need for both sides to find a way to UNMERGE this operation. Let the West go on there own and the East do the same. We know both sides are definitely for that. Eveyone's happy again, there is no way this merger will ever work. (IMHO)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top