Hopefully used? Where did you get that? In questioned some of the engrained rhetoric that some are spouting about how the Nicolau is dead and not to worry about it. Dropping our guard because we have silly conjecture that we made up that makes us feel good needs to be challenged. I don't champion it's use but I question it's death. Got it now? Sigh?
My read of the MOU and the SLI process it puts into place is that the NIC is dead. If I really thought otherwise, I would not vote for it regardless of anything else in it!
Will a seniority based integration with the APA transpire in the JCBA negotiation/arbitration going forward? Who knows, more than likely some hybrid agreement combining DOH, longevity, relative position, size ratios, equipment ratios, fences, freezes.....ect, ect, ect, will coalesce. Nobody will get everything they want, the "snapshot" will be taken in the present and it won't include the NIC.
Like I said, if I really thought differently, I would not vote for the MOU. As it stands, I believe I am correct and accordingly I am voting yes for the MOU. The pay raise will be a pleasant change also.
We can all lament the deterioration of the Airline Pilot profession till the cows come home and it won't change the reality of the industry one iota. If you look closely at the side by side comparison of the MOU/AMR2012 contract with the United and Delta contracts, you will see that, by 2016, this MOU leads us to an "industry standard" contract in short order. You might not particularly like that "standard" but it is what it is and at the end of the day we have to be able to compete to survive, simple as that!
seajay