What's new
By:

Dec 2012 / Jan 2013 US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
cleardirect said:
The key phrase in your rant being

"The Australian pilots who quit their jobs."

Quit their jobs. Not went on strike.


But what does any of that have to do with 2012 and a merger between AWA and US Airways in 2005? Not something 23 years ago.

Absolutely nothing. You have no argument so you are trying to divert attention away from the fact that your union has destroyed the point of unions, unity and has failed for 5 years.

But if you would like to continue please see mr. Dailey I am sure he would love to speak to you about this subject personally.
Click to expand...
Take it up with your dysfunctional friends Metroyet and Nic4. Both throw the scab word on eastern division pilots. Little do they know the group they inhabit, are the actual scabs and their friends. The truth, hurts. Did HPEarly hire a lot of the Franke scabs? I would imagine he did.
 
3dtv said:
When will you stop posting 100% lies? No letter. No NIC.
Click to expand...

You keep that head buried like you easties normally do. Your BPR knows the company's stance with regard to the Nic and the APA know it as well. Your reps know what letter I'm talking about and them shouting down our rep when he read it doesn't make it go away.

There is a letter and it is the Nic. 100% true.

Now STFU.
 
Move2CLT said:
Sure thing you idiot. What did the APA say?

That's what I thought.
Click to expand...

Read some of their posts. The ones about the junior west guys and the Nicolau are interesting. Supports what we have said all along. The APA guys know the age of the East pilots. They know the age of the West pilots. They surmised correctly that putting a bunch of younger guys ahead of the East guys, then merging the list is damaging to them. You guys better get a grip on reality. The APA guys know the Nicolau is not for them. That is why they refuse to talk to Fergie when he comes calling. Begging is actually more like it.
 
Move2CLT said:
Back from your long commute old man?

I understand your bitterness. Divorced, commuting to PHL as an FO, and on the verge of retiring with nothing to show for it.

So go ahead and vent. It makes me laugh.
Click to expand...
As he understands your plight: No Nic. even after years and years. No chance of Davidson, ever. No retirement whatsoever. And and AA merger coming on to cement your bad position. Breeze is sitting pretty good compared to you.
 
luvthe9 said:
As he understands your plight: No Nic. even after years and years. No chance of Davidson, ever. No retirement whatsoever. And and AA merger coming on to cement your bad position. Breeze is sitting pretty good compared to you.
Click to expand...

I'll be in Davidson soon enough.

Nic is it and your reps know it already. Why do you think they isolated Borman? Getting rid of the old crap and cramming the Nic down your throats.
 
Graceson said:
Used to coerce clarity from the court in a most narrow interpretation of liability on LCC's part should there be future litigation. The court responded with clarity -- it affirmed the ninth's ruling; it affirmed a wider (rather than narrower) range of reasonableness.
Click to expand...
Right. Hence the "dangerous ground" comment among others. What is "powerful evidence of a fair result" again?

Provide a LUP and feel free to staple the West...post final and binding arbitration to the contrary. What is the LUP again? I've only asked about 100x never receiving a serious answer...threatening to hold your breath until you turn blue isnt an LUP. Sorry.
 
Move2CLT said:
I'll be in Davidson soon enough.

Nic is it and your reps know it already. Why do you think they isolated Borman? Getting rid of the old crap and cramming the Nic down your throats.



100% lies.

Fear, intimidation, profanity all to distract your lies. The company preference to avoid their obligation to negotiate does not match the rulings from the courthouse.

Carefully read public information on how things will play out. There is no NIC cramdown or acceptance.
Click to expand...
 
Graceson said:
Used to coerce clarity from the court in a most narrow interpretation of liability on LCC's part should there be future litigation. The court responded with clarity -- it affirmed the ninth's ruling; it affirmed a wider (rather than narrower) range of reasonableness.
Click to expand...
What the court said was if usapa can find a reason to change the Nicolau they can (LUP) but the company is going to have to determine if it is an LUP then negotiate a contract.

The company is not going to risk that liability. The court also did not say that usapa could even find one just that they have to have one.

What the company told the court was the believe that the T/A is binding and that since the accepted the Nicolau that is the only list.

Read it for yourself.

That will be used as evidence in the next DFR if the company tries to use something else.
 
Move2CLT said:
Your reps know what letter I'm talking about and them shouting down our rep when he read it doesn't make it go away.
Click to expand...

"Your" reps have been reading a lot of stuff lately. And they will keep getting 8-3 votes on it from now on. They should have brokered a deal instead of going for broke.

Driver...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

I
Here come the New Hires!
2
Replies
16
Views
6K
bigjets
B
F
departures for the 773
Replies
3
Views
3K
eolesen
eolesen
WorldTraveler
Where is AA's Dec 2012 Traffic/RASM data
Replies
4
Views
1K
WorldTraveler
WorldTraveler
OldGuy@AA
First Paycheck for 2013 less than 2012
5 6 7
Replies
101
Views
14K
Bob Owens
B
M
Miami - Liberia, Costa Rica -- Jan 31
Replies
1
Views
1K
FA Mikey
F

Latest posts

Back
Top