cactusboy53
Veteran
- Joined
- May 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,649
- Reaction score
- 7,407
I don't think it is going to be all that "bumpy" of a ride. At least we won't have to be riding it out in the cheap seats. I also think that a negotiated SLI is preferable and achievable.
As I have said since my very first posts on this forum, there is no reason why pilots can not come to a mutually agreed upon and ratifiable SLI amongst themselves. It might not be a pretty or pleasant process, much like making sausage and caesarian birth, but in the end the results are worth the effort.
Why do you suppose the "agreed upon" process going forward is in effect? Could it be what resulted from the TWA and the NIC travesties? Why do you suppose that even ALPO changed their merger criteria to include LOS as a major factor and if necessary a THREE arbitrator panel in their latest "new" policy?
As far as specifically what the SLI will turn out to be, stay tuned. I will consider this merger a win for all the pilots involved, if the SLI is achieved through negotiations conducted by and for the pilots. If that turns out to be the case, I will be 100% supportive of the outcome. If it goes to arbitration, then it will be what it will be and we will all just have to live with it, like it or not. Hence my personal preference that it be a negotiated agreement. Will everybody like ANY SLI? Certainly not, but at least it will be what the pilots agree to, not what a bunch of lawyers decide to shove up our collective butts!
seajay
The NIC is only a "travesty" because it is your opinion. There was no lawyer that decided to "shove" anything. The AAA Merger committee argued how DOH was the ONLY list they would be a party to. They didn't have a "plan B". Had they been more reasonable and argued something different, you may have seen a list that was more palatable. Further, the AAA MEC communicated that DOH was a lock. The parties agreed in advance to comply with the award. There are no do-overs or crossing fingers.
Have you seen what kind of a list is generated in a mutually negotiated SLI in the recent past? Personally, I would prefer to have the case heard from an impartial party. We'll see what is proffered.
CB