What's new

Delta Labor Relations thread.

Kev3188 said:
That's your assumption.

I know the history of our industry, and I expect you do too.
And if you don't, you should. Being ignorant is the easiest way to be manipulated.

So, is he still receiving "assistance" or not?

Do you know?
Beginning to think, this person is not who they say they are, if they are a FA they are posting way too much.
 
700UW said:
Beginning to think, this person is not who they say they are, if they are a FA they are posting way too much.
 
Same could also be said about Kev. How does he participate so much on this forum 24/7 and work full time?
 
Weird isnt it?
 
lol
 
townpete said:
 
Who you trying to kid Kev?
 
Apparently I was kidding myself; I actually thought things like context, accountability, and disclosure mattered to you. Silly me.

But that's my problem.

For everyone else, do you know if he still receives "assistance" from the NRTW?
 
I know Kevin, he is who he says he is, and he is a ground worker, he can post on his downtime on his phone, cant say the same about an alleged FA who cant post at 35,000 feet as its against DL rules and policies.
 
He works eight hours a day and has two days off a week, a lot different schedule than an FA.
 
700UW said:
I know Kevin, he is who he says he is, and he is a ground worker, he can post on his downtime on his phone, cant say the same about an alleged FA who cant post at 35,000 feet as its against DL rules and policies.
 
He works eight hours a day and has two days off a week, a lot different schedule than an FA.
 ​
You don't work
at DAL
and never have.
 ​
 ​
So don't try to
speak of things
you know nothing about.
 
townpete said:
 
 ​
You don't work
at DAL
and never have.
 ​
 ​
So don't try to
speak of things
you know nothing about.
 
Your funny, Oh I know a lot, and see you didnt deny the logic.
 
Once again, you attack the poster and not the issue, seems I struck a nerve.
 
townpete said:
 ​
You don't work
at DAL
and never have.
 ​
 ​
So don't try to
speak of things
you know nothing about.
And you've never been in the IAM, but it sure hasn't stopped you from posting...
 
700UW said:
Your funny, Oh I know a lot, and see you didnt deny the logic.
 
Once again, you attack the poster and not the issue, seems I struck a nerve.
 
The issue is:
 ​
You don't work
at DAL
and never have.
 ​
 ​
So don't try to
speak of things
you know nothing about.
 
700UW said:
Change the subject again, and avoid the topic at hand, typical for you, the low information poster.
Says the non-DL employee, non-IAM rep. Go peddle your crap, elsewhere!
 
700UW said:
Actually it's Parker's mantra the Association has said nothing about wages.
 
I hate to pile on, but glancinng at the AA boards regarding this topic, it looks like the association said nothing about wages because, sadly, they're (still) negotiating uniforms and bulletin boards ... ... ...
See 1AA's post below:
 
1AA said:
We are currently Delta plus Nothing. Thanks to the association dragging it's A$$. Just so you know, both sides have contracts in place untill 2018 or so. I don't see much happening. Isn't unionism just grand.
 
 
700UW said:
AA made all the unions waive their LPPs, the APFA and the IAM had a seniority agreement and the APFA backed out and stapled them, not the IAM.

The IAM stil fought for them and spent millions in legal fees, but the courts ruled in favor of the APFA.
 
The fact that the unions surrendered their LPPs and got nothinig in return tells me the unions were weak.
The fact that the court ruled in favor of APFA tells me that at least one of the union's legal team was weak.
 
700UW said:
And what happened at TWA also caused a federal law McCaskill-Bond to prevent what happened.
If the union movement had political clout, shouldn't something like McCaskill-Bond law have been in place already?
 
FrugalFlyerv2.0 said:
 
I hate to pile on, but glancinng at the AA boards regarding this topic, it looks like the association said nothing about wages because, sadly, they're (still) negotiating uniforms and bulletin boards ... ... ...
See 1AA's post below:
 
 
 
 
The fact that the unions surrendered their LPPs and got nothinig in return tells me the unions were weak.
The fact that the court ruled in favor of APFA tells me that at least one of the union's legal team was weak.
 
If the union movement had political clout, shouldn't something like McCaskill-Bond law have been in place already?
All unions had to remove their LPPs or AA would not purchase TWA, so their choice was job or no job
 
FrugalFlyerv2.0 said:
 
I hate to pile on, but glancinng at the AA boards regarding this topic, it looks like the association said nothing about wages because, sadly, they're (still) negotiating uniforms and bulletin boards ... ... ...
See 1AA's post below:
 
 
 
 
The fact that the unions surrendered their LPPs and got nothinig in return tells me the unions were weak.
The fact that the court ruled in favor of APFA tells me that at least one of the union's legal team was weak.
 
If the union movement had political clout, shouldn't something like McCaskill-Bond law have been in place already?
 
 
ooooooooohhh
 
Slam!
 
Best post evahhhhh
 

Latest posts

Back
Top