What's new

Delta Labor Relations thread.

You do realize the IAM and the IAMNPF are two totally separate entities.
 
townpete said:
 
Thats nice.
 
Im placing it here to remind 700 and the others how corrupt his organization is.
 
And will continue to do so despite you and the others best efforts to spin their way out of it.
Using that flawed logic means that since a DL employee was dumb enough to use his passes to smuggle guns, DL is corrupt.
 
Kev3188 said:
Using that flawed logic means that since a DL employee was dumb enough to use his passes to smuggle guns, DL is corrupt.
 
So you're comparing a lone DAL employee to all these high level people at IAM? 
 
People like Robert Roach, Warren Mart, Burton Trebour, Alfred Nelson, Lynn Tucker, Philip Gruber, Gary Allen, Robert Martinez Jr., and Thomas Connery?

 
lol
 
Kev3188 said:
My example used your flawed logic.
 
And a poor example at that as well.
 
You're comparing IAM trustees who hold a far higher position in the organization, to a low level DAL employee.
 
Ok then....
 
Kev3188 said:
My example used your flawed logic.
 
And a poor example at that as well.
 
You're comparing IAM trustees who hold a far higher position in the organization, to a low level DAL employee.
 
Ok then....
 
Kev3188 said:
If you don't want your fallacies exposed, don't put them on display for all of us to see.
 
What fallacies? 
 
You mean your comparison of one low level DAL employee compared to nine senior IAM officials?
 
700UW said:
You do realize the IAM and the IAMNPF are two totally separate entities.
Maybe so but you can't be in it unless your a IAM dues paying member and if you leave the IAM the dues stop and your no longer getting vested. The IAM threatens it's members what will happen to their pensions if the leave the IAM. Sounds pretty much like they are both in the same bed.
 
Kev3188 said:
Dont be coy; you know what you're doing...
 
What am i doing Kev?
 
Why are you trying to compare the actions of one lone, low level DAL employee to nine senior IAM officials?
 
I understand that this is yet another PR disaster for IAM, but trying to spin it away is ridiculous.
 
Your best answer would be to say something like. "Yeah thats messed up" or "that's not good"
 
But you cant even do that.
 
Instead you try to trump up some kind of moral equivalency comparing the actions of one low level DAL employee to nine senior IAM officials?
 
Senior officials who are responsible to their members.
 
1AA said:
Maybe so but you can't be in it unless your a IAM dues paying member and if you leave the IAM the dues stop and your no longer getting vested. The IAM threatens it's members what will happen to their pensions if the leave the IAM. Sounds pretty much like they are both in the same bed.
Half true. You may need to be a member to get in, but not to be (or stay on). I'm a participant, but haven't paid dues nor been an active IAM member for several years.
 
Kev3188 said:
I'm merely applying the same flawed logic you used.
 
Talking in circles isn't going to make your (lack of) argument any more clearer.
 
I know what you're trying to do.
 
It's your basic defensive retreat to "nothing to see here, move along" 
 
But like i said this is a monumental nightmare PR disaster for IAM trying to portray themselves as protectors of the working class.
 
And then stealing from them at the same time.
 
Not good your cause Kev, not good at all.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top