What's new

Democracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey Ken, now you have another year of yelling about the use of alias'...looking forward to your crying again....typical amfa.
 
I already know what..no need to guess.

<~~~~~~~~~~But let the amfaites help themselves to a few..
 
The twu still can not answer a simple question.

The twu still can not face the truth.

The twu will still be removed from representing AA AMTs.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...you crack me up Kenny boy...."Still no answer from the twu supporting alias using cowards? "..is that sentence copywrited yet?
 
DECISION 2007 said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...you crack me up Kenny boy...."Still no answer from the twu supporting alias using cowards? "..is that sentence copywrited yet?
[post="185272"][/post]​


Why don't you answer the question?
 
"Can a twu supporter answer why not all twu positions are voted on by the full membership? "

Was this the question you so badly desired to be answered Kenny boy? You rant and rave about so much it's hard to keep up. Under our constitution it shows you how to elect officers, go do your own homework Ken.

Full membership vote? Is that what you see in amfa? Not the outsourcing amfa members have allowed, not the spankings the courts have given them, but a full membership vote. Well Ken, you might get with your local president and let him know who you desire in whichever position. If the majority of your local desire the same loyal TWU person, well...you know the routine, actually you're just wanting or searching something to cry about...so cry on brother....
 
Nightwatch said:
"Can a twu supporter answer why not all twu positions are voted on by the full membership? "

Was this the question you so badly desired to be answered Kenny boy? You rant and rave about so much it's hard to keep up. Under our constitution it shows you how to elect officers, go do your own homework Ken.

Full membership vote? Is that what you see in amfa? Not the outsourcing amfa members have allowed, not the spankings the courts have given them, but a full membership vote. Well Ken, you might get with your local president and let him know who you desire in whichever position. If the majority of your local desire the same loyal TWU person, well...you know the routine, actually you're just wanting or searching something to cry about...so cry on brother....
[post="189576"][/post]​

WOW! nw, you mean to tell me that in the twu I get to tell someone else on how I want them to vote for me instead of myself actually casting a ballot? And all with no way of recording how this person will actually vote? Dream on coward!

Once again, nw, answer the question put forth to all twu supporters. Why can't the full membership vote on all international officers in the twu?
 
344 days and counting, tic, toc, tic, toc..
 
Hey Ken, ever win a fight? Think amfa ever will? I sense your discouragement and do not blame you one bit.
 
Nightwatch said:
Hey Ken, ever win a fight? Think amfa ever will? I sense your discouragement and do not blame you one bit.
[post="190050"][/post]​

nw, ever think of using your real name when defending the twu? You don't sense discouragement. You sense my desire for a democratic and craft union for my profession. You also sense my resolve to inform others of the truth about the twu. And with each passing day that you and the other alias using twu supporters refrain from answering the simple question as to why twu international officers are not elected on by the full membership only confirms the basic truth about the twu... they are not democratic and care nothing about the membership.

The twu, a union that will lie and steal your money. Why? Because they can do that brother! 😛h34r: 😛h34r:
 
No, I sense your discouragement, just as I previously stated. Your resolve is to get amfa in at AA, at `no matter what cost to jobs and to the mechanics there. Even when informed of amfa's ineffectiveness as a BA at ALL 8 AIRLINES it represents, you continue to promote the losers.

I also believe you are not Ken McTiernan, but use that moniker to shed yourself of liability of your rantings. You are a common coward, posting under an assumed identity, shame on you.
 
Nightwatch said:
No, I sense your discouragement, just as I previously stated. Your resolve is to get amfa in at AA, at `no matter what cost to jobs and to the mechanics there. Even when informed of amfa's ineffectiveness as a BA at ALL 8 AIRLINES it represents, you continue to promote the losers.

I also believe you are not Ken McTiernan, but use that moniker to shed yourself of liability of your rantings. You are a common coward, posting under an assumed identity, shame on you.
[post="190712"][/post]​


Still no reply? Perhaps you can ask someone more informed and inform all here why the twu fears having international officers elected by the full membership. 😀
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top