Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

[737823]

since you just told us that you will stick with AA, take your assaults on their unions to their site.Please and thank you.

I still fly DL a good amount and maintain PM. WT I am not anti-DL, I just have a preference to fly AA. DL is my solid #2 carrier.

Josh

 

[Kev3188]

So its ok for u to turn every thread into pro dl crap but u want everyone else to stick to topics really brilliant

Maybe he doesn't want the competition...
 
 

And you know this because of your inside connections, I take it?

Aw, that's cute. You don't know how FB works, do you?

 

[WorldTraveler]

Maybe he doesn't want the competition...

I take back the comment I just said about you having more sense.

You would have to be blind, deaf, and dumb - all at the same time - to not see how I relish competition - in the marketplace and on here.

I'm not much interested in turncoats, though.

 

[Kev3188]

Does this mean we're done hearing about the APFA contract from you?

 

[WorldTraveler]

only as much as the profit sharing that DL FAs are getting and AA FAs are not makes a difference.

and a number of DL FAs said this weekend that they were quite happy with the profit sharing checks they just received.

 

[Kev3188]

Good for them.

So just to be clear:

Josh talking about AA= no good.

WT talking about AA= A-okay.

Got it, thanks.

 

[WorldTraveler]

nobody said Josh can or cannot talk about anything.

Talking about AA's unions picketing on a DL forum makes no sense except to fan the flames.

Since that is the way you operate, of course it wouldn't be expected that you would get it.

It is far easier to find support from those who aren't even receiving the same paycheck you do than from those who actually report to the same execs as you do.

 

[Kev3188]

Your attempts at framing me as a pot stirrer are duly noted.
 
So again, just so I'm clear; no more talking about OAL unions?

 

[737823]

since you just told us that you will stick with AA, take your assaults on their unions to their site.Please and thank you.

  

nobody said Josh can or cannot talk about anything.Talking about AA's unions picketing on a DL forum makes no sense except to fan the flames.Since that is the way you operate, of course it wouldn't be expected that you would get it.It is far easier to find support from those who aren't even receiving the same paycheck you do than from those who actually report to the same execs as you do.

Josh

 

[WorldTraveler]

Your attempts at framing me as a pot stirrer are duly noted.
 
So again, just so I'm clear; no more talking about OAL unions?

sorry but if you don't see your one man internet crusade for what it is, then I doubt if you would recognize anything that anyone says.

I said I would keep out of the WHOLE DL unionization campaign as long as other airline and non-DL employees stayed out of talking about DL labor issues.

since we've had numerous people who have refused to agree, I'll play by the rules I want to keep.

If you'd like to stand up and tell ALL of us (me included) who aren't active DL employees to stay out of the discussion about DL labor issues, I'll GLADLY agree as long as you enforce it equally and fairly.

Since you've said you're not interested in keeping the discussion just among DL employees, I don't have any intentions of defining the conversation the way you or anyone else wants to.

none of that has anything to do with the fact that Josh's discussion about potential labor action at US hubs has nothing to do with DL.

 

[Kev3188]

Josh--

Soooo, are you agreeing with WT's assertion that you're merely stirring the pot, or simply showing that you know how to use the multi-quote function?

What strange bedfellows you two make.

 

[WorldTraveler]

hey toots, YOU'RE the pot stirrer I am talking about.

no bed sharing for me, thank you very much.

 

[Kev3188]

sorry but if you don't see your one man internet crusade for what it is, then I doubt if you would recognize anything that anyone says.

Says the man with a stated goal of "board domination."

I said I would keep out of the WHOLE DL unionization campaign as long as other airline and non-DL employees stayed out of talking about DL labor issues.

since we've had numerous people who have refused to agree, I'll play by the rules I want to keep.

If you'd like to stand up and tell ALL of us (me included) who aren't active DL employees to stay out of the discussion about DL labor issues, I'll GLADLY agree as long as you enforce it equally and fairly.

Since you've said you're not interested in keeping the discussion just among DL employees, I don't have any intentions of defining the conversation the way you or anyone else wants to.

yeah, I'm not sure why you keep wanting to beat that dead horse. The idea of walling off threads is really only something that exists in your mind. You wanna bulldoze through here? Have a good time. I've got zero interest in advocating a restriction on the discussion, even if that means having to wade through (or skipping over) your ramblings.

none of that has anything to do with the fact that Josh's discussion about potential labor action at US hubs has nothing to do with DL.

Oh, but when it involves AA F/A's it does? Okay, got it.

 

[737823]

weAA posted on WCDFA a picture of him (and other TWU members) picketing at the MIA North Terminal (where AA operates from).  He said something to the effect of this is what being in a union is about.  My point in bringing it up is that 700 and others can't keep saying there is all this interest among DL employees when many of the people that frequent that site are not connected to DL and will not be voting in any potential election.
 
Josh

 

[Kev3188]

Good for him. Dude behind him on line has questionable taste in football, though.

Still worried that your account may have been hacked. No "Joshes" identifying as moneychangers.