So, who decides now what gets written up and what doesn't. Is the company going to pay me while the FAA pursues certificate action against me for not writing up all maintenance items? I also have to accept all the MELs the company wants to stick on an airplane regardless of the weather, airport conditions, our ability to cope with all of them. And for Gods sake don't taxi too slow while you are trying to figure out what works and what doesn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out how the FAA lets this place operate...ESPECIALLY under these conditions.
Driver <_<
The same people who always decided what gets written up. The Captains, the First Officers, the Maintenance Techs. It really ain't rocket science or a mission to Mars people.
Go to work, do your job, go home, get paid. Really,,,really,,,really simple.
No, the company is not going to pay you if you get violated and can't fly during say a 90 day revocation.
You do not have to accept "all" MELs, and would be expected to refuse to operate with an MEL that prohibits said operation. (i.e. operating into icing with an MEL that prohibits ops in know icicng.)
You are not expected to work sick, or fatigued.
The FAA lets this place operate, because the FAA has nothing to do with the NMB and the fact that a scab union trying to steal something that does not belong to them, cries "safety" wolf. This has nothing to do with the safe operation of the airline.
PS. The Nic award is alive and well, and the only "accepted system seniority list at LCC". It ain't going away!!
PSS. Seeham is still a union busting scab lawyer. He is just 10 million richer, can prove all the billable hours, and thanks usapa for their ignorance.
PSSS.
Integrity Matters......Get it Yet???