What's new

Iraq,no ties to 9-11?

delldude

Veteran
Joined
Oct 29, 2002
Messages
29,210
Reaction score
6,091
Location
Downrange
WASHINGTON – With suggestions the U.S. negotiate with Syria and Iran dominating the news, Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin reports Washington has already been talking quietly to a Syrian dissident group linked directly to the 9/11 hijackers and their sponsors in al-Qaida.
The group is the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, known for its association with al-Qaida and allied with former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.


Both Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein supported the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. For years, bin Laden gave financial assistance to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. Saddam Hussein provided material support due to his Baathist opposition to the late Hafez al-Assad.

Right wing lies of course:
 
Consider the source: WorldNetDaily, the premier fringe right wing fear mongering site run by the self loathing Arab, Joseph Farah.

🙄
 
Consider the source: WorldNetDaily, the premier fringe right wing fear mongering site run by the self loathing Arab, Joseph Farah.

🙄
Ethnic slurs your game? Whats being of Arab decent have to do with anything?

Funny he looked American to me dude.

Your main man:
 
WASHINGTON – With suggestions the U.S. negotiate with Syria and Iran dominating the news, Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin reports Washington has already been talking quietly to a Syrian dissident group linked directly to the 9/11 hijackers and their sponsors in al-Qaida.
The group is the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, known for its association with al-Qaida and allied with former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.


Both Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein supported the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. For years, bin Laden gave financial assistance to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. Saddam Hussein provided material support due to his Baathist opposition to the late Hafez al-Assad.

Right wing lies of course:


Wow! What a smoking gun! I'm amazed that Bushie hasn't made this public yet and only the super-secret radical right wing blog of WorldNetDaily has been able to break it. Hopefully Tony Snow picks up on this and informs the prez so that he can make these claims.

Again...if there were a credible link, Bushie would have flaunted it long ago. You are stretching as you have been doing alot lately. You seem really desperate for something to go your way, Dell, and you have gone the way of local 12 by posting only from radical-right blogs.

Thanks again for the smoking gun 🙄 Another desperate attempt to take the eyes of America off of reality.
 
Please,do tell...exactly what is a credible link there
Mr.Global warming ex-spurt?

A credible link between Iraq and 9/11? How about there isn't one b/c Bushie hasn't pointed one out? Hasn't even crafted one and that is amazing for this administration. That alone speaks volumes. In fact I believe he said "NOTHING!" when asked what Iraq had to do with 9/11. Perhaps a credible link would be...oh...if perhaps the hijackers were Iraqi and not Saudi! Perhaps if we could draw a real link to Saddam...it can be done in instances where a link truly does exist...just look at Gadhafi. But there are no credible links between 9/11 and Iraq. We didn't invade Iraq on that pretense and the only reason that ultra-conserva-blogs such as WorldNetDaily are now trying to manufacture a link is to help rewrite history as to why we invaded Iraq. It was for WMDs. Remember? Not fighter jets that fled to Iraq's enemy, Iran, either as you tried to pass as WMDs. Again...Bushie would have claimed victory if even an inkling were found but oops...looks like there was nothing but a bunch of sand...oh and all the warm welcomes that you tell us our soldiers are faced with every day despite being killed every day.
 
Dude...you act as though you're about to lose the farm.

Whats a credible source for your esteemed liberal use?

Dan Rather? :lol:

Yes Virginia,there are good stories coming out of Iraq...just your little mind fails to acknowledge them. 😉
 
Dude...you act as though you're about to lose the farm.

Whats a credible source for your esteemed liberal use?

Dan Rather? :lol:

Yes Virginia,there are good stories coming out of Iraq...just your little mind fails to acknowledge them. 😉

"credible link" means link between iraq and 9/11...not website. Didn't you even read my email?

Tell me how it looked like I am about to lose the farm? By pointing out the Bush knows there is no link between Iraq and 9/11 (that's link as in tie...not as in website...how hard is that to comprehend?) and the no WMDs were found it sounds like I'm about to lose the farm? That's just you trying to twist what I've said to you again (that you are desperate b/c you are claiming things that Bush won't even claim).

And I don't dispute at all that there are good stories coming out of Iraq. I see them often. But they are only about 10% of what I see on the news. Is that bias? I'd hardly say so. Bias would be to show the "feel goods" 50% of the time even though they are occurring far less frequently and have nil ramifications compared to the mounting death toll and escalating violence every day. To try to paint Iraq as a bunch of shiny happy people holding hands would be a bias.
 
So how are you this morning....

By credible link I am refering to what you and Garfield are willing to accept as actual factual liberal approoved news and or information sources...You know,like Fox news :lol:

About the Bushie thing and Iraq/9-11 Terrorism links...I never told any lib's this but I figured it out a couple years ago that 9-11 and Hussien had little,if any connection.I'm sure theres some indirect remote ties through funds,etc.Hell Saddam was tight with Syria and helped Hezzbollah through the "exploding Palestinian children program"....you know,put your child on the line for Allah and get Instant Cash-$25,000.

I still insist there are WMD's out in the Bekka Valley and in Syria.You fail to accept the FACTS that yes indeed some things were found.....you do know what they do with yellowcake now don't you?(oops wasn't a W80 warhead).

There wasn't very much good in Iraq under Hussien...and like a good neighbor,it was right to go in and stop the regime....it curtailed the exploding child program with cash incentives overnite.That was quite out of hand and a terrible perversion of a religion.That alone,to me justified military action.

As far as this:
And I don't dispute at all that there are good stories coming out of Iraq. I see them often. But they are only about 10% of what I see on the news. Is that bias? I'd hardly say so. Bias would be to show the "feel goods" 50% of the time even though they are occurring far less frequently and have nil ramifications compared to the mounting death toll and escalating violence every day. To try to paint Iraq as a bunch of shiny happy people holding hands would be a bias.

Insurgents work in and around the Sunni triangle trying to start civil war with the Shiites....Sure there are other areas of action but its not every street corner like you imply.In fact as time goes on the areas and insurgents are getting smaller day by day.You actually think its bad around every corner and under every rock?Well if you do you're quite wrong.Ex-mil's have told me time and time again what we see on TV doesn't depict what is going on over there.....I figure they were there,they ought to know better than Anderson Cooper.

As to reliable,credible sources...check this out:

What's Wrong With the News?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Independent, aggressive and critical media are essential to an informed democracy. But mainstream media are increasingly cozy with the economic and political powers they should be watchdogging. Mergers in the news industry have accelerated, further limiting the spectrum of viewpoints that have access to mass media. With U.S. media outlets overwhelmingly owned by for-profit conglomerates and supported by corporate advertisers, independent journalism is compromised.

Ultimately, FAIR believes that structural reform is needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting, and promote strong, non-profit alternative sources of information.

Check out these links for more of FAIR's analysis of the media business:

Corporate Ownership
Advertiser Influence
Official Agendas
Telecommunications Policy
The PR Industry
Pressure Groups
The Narrow Range of Debate
Censorship
Sensationalism


Heres a link

I really do not watch Fox News as its a premium channel and i'm too cheap 😉

Have a nice weekend dude......
 
I still insist there are WMD's out in the Bekka Valley and in Syria.You fail to accept the FACTS that yes indeed some things were found.....you do know what they do with yellowcake now don't you?(oops wasn't a W80 warhead).

delldude, you and I know why we went into Iraq but you will never get a right wing hating, Bush bashing, anti war, liberal to admit it was justified. They presume just because we did'nt find ICBM silos in the desert that no WMD's existed. Saddam was a threat that had to be removed, he invaded kuwait and was a threat to the whole gulf region. he continued to play cat and mouse with the IAEA only allowing them to inspect certain sites, often times rolling trucks out the back door as the inspectors walked thru the front and finally kicked them out in 1998 , he ignored every UN resolution that was drafted, he even fired upon flights that were patrolling the no fly zone. The man was a ticking time bomb thumbing his nose at the world and after 11 years he just did'nt seem to get it.

We will probably never know what/if he had any ties with Al Qa'eda directly or indirectly, Did he help bin laden mastermind 9/11? I doubt it but we do know he sponsored terrorism thru funding as you already mentioned concerning suicide bombers,(whats next handing off a nuke?) but that was'nt the reason we went to Iraq. We also did'nt go into Iraq so Bush II could extract revenge far Papa as some left wing nuts like to spout off, we went into Iraq because all the intelligencia was saying there were still WMD's In Iraq and the capability to produce them had not been entirely removed.

Of course this link is'nt from 'nightline' and the report was drafted by the CIA in 2002 just prior to the Invasion therefore its probably not a 'credible news source' for the 'Its all Bush's fault' Haters. 🙄

https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm
 
delldude, you and I know why we went into Iraq but you will never get a right wing hating, Bush bashing, anti war, liberal to admit it was justified.

I know...but sometimes its fun trying..... 😉
 
delldude, you and I know why we went into Iraq but you will never get a right wing hating, Bush bashing, anti war, liberal to admit it was justified.

You'll never get any American with even an ounce of common sense that the good Lord gave him/her to believe it either! :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top