June - US Pilots Labor Discussion

[jetjok1]

Thanks, my friends......the surgery went well...only problem was that I had Nurse Ratchet trying to force a breathing tube down my throat. The last time I had a surgery, there was no problem, tonight, I can only utter a few words before my throat kills me.

Soreness in my abdomen will probly set in tomorrow, but I hope to be back within a week.

breeze

Cool.....congrats.......glad things went well. Hopefully , nurse ratchet is off tomorrow

 

[Move2CLT]

Move,

You are dreamin again. Obviously, USAPA and APA are busy working out a SLI using DOH with C/Rs. If that doesn't work out, Parker is looking forward to the new arbitration to settle this whole mess.

breeze

Quite obvious the anesthesia hasn't worn off yet.

You guys have been wrong on everything else breeze and chances are high that you were still high when you wrote your post.

MDA, DOH, snapbacks, LOA 93, work action, injunction...

...when will you ever learn?

Go sleep it off.

 

[BoeingBoy]

You just aren't worth my time.

Ahhh, the final respite for those who don't have the facts on their side - declare victory and run away....

Jim

 

[BoeingBoy]

Hey East,

Take a look at what Jim posted in 2008, during the infamous thread that outed the fake combat Naval Aviator, "Nice Landing Captain."

<<One of my brothers was in that little dust-up but probably before you - he was flying the Thud in that other branch of service. Fortunately, the closest I got was S Korea more toward the end.

Jim>>

I assume that there's a point in there somewhere...

What, you've never heard of siblings being in the same generation, especially one that covers a fairly broad age range as the Vietnam generation? Yes, my next older brother was in Vietnam - your point? Yes, our military service (I've never said that I was a military pilot or served in Vietnam BTW) actually overlapped by several months - any point yet?

In my original post that EastUS took exception to I never made a claim that wasn't true. If you think otherwise, point to what you think was false and I'll straighten you out. When EastUS first took exception, I suggested he utilize the services of a good dictionary - M-W will do fine - and I suggest that you do the same before following EastUS into that same sink hole. I think you'll find that only archaic British use of the pronoun "one" is what EastUS has staked his entire argument on.

Jim

 

[EastUS1]

"Hey East,

Take a look at what Jim posted in 2008, during the infamous thread that outed the fake combat Naval Aviator, "Nice Landing Captain."

<<One of my brothers was in that little dust-up but probably before you - he was flying the Thud in that other branch of service. Fortunately, the closest I got was S Korea more toward the end.

The impression was clearly left of a near miss by a trained and ready military aviator. I certainly thought so at the time."

I assume that there's a point in there somewhere...

What, you've never heard of siblings being in the same generation, especially one that covers a fairly broad age range as the Vietnam generation? Yes, my next older brother was in Vietnam - your point? Yes, our military service (I've never said that I was a military pilot or served in Vietnam BTW) actually overlapped by several months - any point yet?

In my original post that EastUS took exception to I never made a claim that wasn't true. If you think otherwise, point to what you think was false and I'll straighten you out. When EastUS first took exception, I suggested he utilize the services of a good dictionary - M-W will do fine - and I suggest that you do the same before following EastUS into that same sink hole. I think you'll find that only archaic British use of the pronoun "one" is what EastUS has staked his entire argument on.

Jim

"I think you'll find that only archaic British use of the pronoun "one" is what EastUS has staked his entire argument on."

Yet more contrived and wholesale, lying BS...not that such in anyway surprises anyone. "One" is not what's at issue in any way. Read the entire conversation and then make your best effort to HONESTLY explain your response, within ANY reasonable, contextual reference, that in ANY way makes even the slightest bit of actual sense....Good luck: "BoeingBoy: "LOL You have no idea what cockpits I've strappen into."

1) BoeingBoy: "I come from a generation that experienced Vietnam winding down where one couldn't automatically expect to move from a military cockpit to a civilian cockpit."

"...move from a military cockpit to a civilian cockpit." Is there ANY, even remotely possible ambiguity within the contextual reference for that observation?...Seriously, ANY at all?

2) "As if you ever strapped into a military cockpit". Again; Is there ANY possible ambiguity in the contextual reference there?

3) BoeingBoy: "LOL You have no idea what cockpits I've strappen into."

WHY would anyone reasonably post that last bit within the context of what was being discussed? WHAT was your full "thinking" while writing that last in response to ANYTHING that proceeded it?

BBoy: "One of my brothers was in that little dust-up but probably before you - he was flying the Thud in that other branch of service. Fortunately, the closest I got was S Korea more toward the end."

Darience: "The impression was clearly left of a near miss by a trained and ready military aviator. I certainly thought so at the time." Indeed. My take as well. I believe that was the intended effect both then and again so recently...and no amount of referencing any dictionary is needed to very reasonably observe that.

 

[EastUS1]

Thanks, my friends......the surgery went well...
Soreness in my abdomen will probly set in tomorrow, but I hope to be back within a week.

Glad to hear that all went well...save for the Nurse Ratchet factor anyway. 😉 See ya' around campus soon.

 

[BoeingBoy]

Seems I was wrong - you're just going to keep declaring "victory" over and over again. I'll note that you have not yet pointed to any factual error (other than the typo of using a "n" instead of "d" in strapped) in anything I've said. Which means, of course, that I didn't lie as you've claimed. But just like all the other sure victories the east has counted only to be disappointed, keep declaring victory...

Jim

 

[EastUS1]

Seems I was wrong - you're just going to keep declaring "victory" over and over again. I'll note that you have not yet pointed to any factual error (other than the typo of using a "n" instead of "d" in strapped) in anything I've said. Which means, of course, that I didn't lie as you've claimed. But just like all the other sure victories the east has counted only to be disappointed, keep declaring victory...

Jim

"NiceLandingCaptain" put up pretty much the very same sort of BS once confronted.

Read the entire conversation and then make your best effort to HONESTLY explain your response, within ANY reasonable, contextual reference, that in ANY way makes even the slightest bit of actual sense....Good luck: "BoeingBoy: "LOL You have no idea what cockpits I've strappen into."

BoeingBoy: "I come from a generation that experienced Vietnam winding down where one couldn't automatically expect to move from a military cockpit to a civilian cockpit."

"As if you ever strapped into a military cockpit"

"BoeingBoy: "LOL You have no idea what cockpits I've strappen into."

WHY would anyone reasonably post that last bit within the context of what was being discussed? WHAT was your full "thinking" while writing that last in response to ANYTHING that proceeded it?"

I see you're entirely incapable of forming any even slightly reasonable response in feebly attempting the most pathetic defense of your despicable behavior. There's no need for any inappropriate declarations of "victory", since this amounts to little more than peeling stuck chewing gum off a shoe sole.

 

[BoeingBoy]

I made factual statements. Whatever nonsense you chose to read into those statements is strictly your problem, not mine.

Let's see...

1 - You haven't produced a list of airplanes that I have strapped into.
2 - You haven't produced a list of airplanes that I haven't strapped into, despite claiming to know the planes on that list.
3 - You always leave that little "one" our of your "contextual reference", then somehow arrive at the faulty conclusion that I said that I moved from a military to airline cockpit as Vietnam was winding down. That little "one" makes all the difference in the world, except to you.

Gee - you haven't produced anything to give the slightest indication that my statements weren't factual, yet you claim that I'm a liar. What a surprise...NOT. Something about 3 strikes and you're out comes to mind...

Jim

 

[EastUS1]

2 - You haven't produced a list of airplanes that I haven't strapped into, despite claiming to know the planes on that list.

Those would be all aircraft bearing the USA's Colors in active Service during your tenure in the military. Do you really require a full list of those, so as to better enhance your fantasies?

BBoy: "That little "one" makes all the difference in the world, except to you." That's pathetic past all possible belief.

Dismissed.

 

[BoeingBoy]

Those would be all aircraft bearing the USA's Colors in active Service during your tenure in the military.

Does the F106 count? Darn, that blows your theory out of the water doesn't it? Seems that you can't get even a partial list right...

Dismissed.

That's the ticket...just keep declaring victory - "If you don't let me win I'll take your toys and go home" is the usuall schoolyard bully's retort. Someone will believe you...maybe...someday...

Jim

 

[EastUS1]

Does the F106 count?

Puh-leeeze. If you ever got a ride in the training version of one; that makes you as much a military "Aviator" as does some reporter going up with the TBirds or Blues qualifiy them as team members.

BBoy: "Someone will believe you...maybe...someday..." Good luck with that 😉

 

[BoeingBoy]

Puh-leeeze. If you ever got a ride in one; that makes you as much a military "Aviator" as does some reporter going up with the TBirds or Blues qualifiy them as team members.

I rest my case. I've never claimed to be a military "aviator". Only that you'd be surprised at the airplanes I've strapped into. So who's fibbing now???

Jim

 

[EastUS1]

I've never claimed to be a military "aviator". Only that you'd be surprised at the airplanes I've strapped into. So who's fibbing now???

So by "strapped into"; you truly meant only as a passenger? Puhleeeze again.

BBoy: "Someone will believe you...maybe...someday..."

 

[EastUS1]

I rest my case. I've never claimed to be a military "aviator". Only that you'd be surprised at the airplanes I've strapped into. So who's fibbing now???

Jim

PS: "So by "strapped into"; you truly meant only as a passenger? Puhleeeze again." Ummm...is there perhaps some dictionary "one" should continually reference to ensure an ongoing and entirely accurate understanding of your ever changing "definitions" within any/ALL conversational contexts?