What's new

June - US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, boys, I am going under the knife in the morning to get my gallbladder removed. I have gall stones and my FAA doctor says it's best to get it removed instead of needing emergency surgery while in Athens or some other foreign destination. Not a big deal.

However, if things get crazy and I don't return to the line, I just want to say...it's been a pleasure flying with your East guys......and you West guys can go screw yourselves!!!! LOL...kidding of course.

Later,
breeze

Pretty tame surgery and you should be back in a month or so. Best wishes.
 
Its not a matter of who is smarter. Its an opinion either way. ALPA's premise was always that they were smarter than the members, and they gambled away $11M of dues.
Just like a judge or arbitrator. Their's is the only opinion that counts.

Just like usapa gets to interpret their C&BL ALPA gets to interpret what merger policy is. They determined that the Nicolau did comply with their policy.

 
East-

Perhaps it's as hard for you to read simple English as it is for you to write it. "One" member of the generation Jim referred to does not necessarily mean himself.

Something so simple but it stumps EastUS. He won't even include it when quoting my post.


1) BoeingBoy: "I come from a generation that experienced Vietnam winding down where one couldn't automatically expect to move from a military cockpit to a civilian cockpit."

"...move from a military cockpit to a civilian cockpit." Is there ANY, even remotely possible ambiguity within the contextual reference for that observation?...Seriously, ANY at all?

There is absolutely no ambiguity but of course you take it to mean the opposite of what it says - as normal, You do love to pick out snippits to create a basis for an argument, leaving out the context of the whole message. I am a member of the Vietnam generation, as were those who portested that war. Being a member of a group that became identified by what became an unpopular "war" means nothing by itself, other than being born within in a certain range of dates.

2) "As if you ever strapped into a military cockpit". Again; Is there ANY possible ambiguity in the contextual reference there?

3) BoeingBoy: "LOL You have no idea what cockpits I've strappen into."

What am I supposedly missing here? The unambiguous nature of the conversation's "military cockpit" meaning actual Service?

BBoy: "A contextual reference for pilots leaving the military as Vietnam ended, certainly, but not for me."
You've a rather strange way of establishing "certainly, but not for me." FYI...."LOL You have no idea what cockpits I've strappen into" however surprisingly, falls "somewhat" short of establishing "certainly, but not for me." Even for military pilots of that generation (a subset of the larger group) one couldn't automatically count on moving from a military cockpit to a major airline cockpit (notice that "one" in there?). So that is an absolutely true statement.

So is the "You have no idea what cockpits I've strapped into." Do you see "military" in there anywhere (although you'd probably be surprised at the military cockpits I've strapped into - not been qualified on the plane necessarily but strapped into the cockpit).

So it's time to own up like a man instead of hiding like a child - my statements were accurate and you've called me a liar at least twice. I'll accept your apology graciously but expect it to be forthcoming...

Or you can keep up your silly game....

Jim
 
Hello Move,

Sorry, but I just saw your little snide comments,

Snide? Hardly. It was straight up, honest advice.

so I am a little slow...

That you are.

Aren't you about to log enough hours to do your private cross country solo? Or maybe I'm out of line here, since I don't know what a desk monkey like you is paid. Anyway, just keep practicing that Windows Flight Simulator and it will all come together some day.

Come on now breeze, you can do better than that. Even with your limited cognitive faculties, something with a bit more bite could have been presented.

Take another shot.

Keep that dream alive and when you someday.....maybe in 20 yrs have logged around 20,000 hours, we will discuss those little snide comments, as I know you just don't understand right now.

In 20 years breeze you'll be nothing more than dust.

BTW, my attitude has improved greatly since I learned what is required to maintain good web board status....you should check into it.

breeze

You should know what it takes by now. You've had yourself a few meltdowns. As for me, I've got 5000+s so I know all about good web board status. Let me know when you bust 1000. LMAO!
 
Just like a judge or arbitrator. Their's is the only opinion that counts.

Just like usapa gets to interpret their C&BL ALPA gets to interpret what merger policy is. They determined that the Nicolau did comply with their policy.

For decades the lapdog advocates of ALPA used to answer dissatisfied ALPA members with an accusing slogan, "YOU are ALPA."

Indeed, they should have realized the members would eventually believe it. In the end, "ALPA's" opinion mattered the most and the self-important council that thought they were above it all lost $11M. :lol:
 
All water under the bridge, the question remaining is whether USAPA is binded by the award or free to fairly represent its membership.

I had to read your post twice...I am not trying to be the grammar police here, but since you used the word "binded" instead of the more common bound...I mistakenly thought you were asking "the question remaining is whether USAPA is bLinded by the award or free to fairly represent its membership".

To which the answere would have been.....yes, usapa is BLINDED by the award.

It is the blind leading the blind on an endless chase of shifting shadows of how to best renege on an agreement its membership has amongst itself. So the reply to your real question can easily be answered.

Yes, usapa is "free to fairly represent its membership", but they are to blind to see that "fairly" means the Nic.
 
Ok....So just explain the following,.....

What is the difference between a pile of undisturbed dog #### and a pile of dog #### after you stir it with your coffee stir? Nothing, but I hope you like your coffee black.

If a woman divorces you because she is addicted to nagging, she will keep nagging you if you answer her phone calls. :lol:
 
.... - my statements were accurate and you've called me a liar at least twice. I'll accept your apology graciously but expect it to be forthcoming...

Grab some knee pads and head for the nearest bus station or dog pound. You would have better success at regaining some self respect at said institutions than to keep this pathetic, dishonest and entirely contrived BS going here. "Or you can keep up your silly game...."as sick games are all you're clearly useful for. "....you've called me a liar at least twice." Was it only twice?...I must have been in a very generous mood indeed. 😉

You must know what BS you tried to pass off, and only the most devout, village idiots that so lean towards your "support" in attacking all things east could, in ANY way, shape or form, be even the tiniest bit supportive of your wholesale BS.

You should apologize for wasting good air, space and food on this fine world all inhabit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top