m&r

av60

Advanced
Jul 6, 2003
184
0
www.usaviation.com
2007-100
IAM / U S AIRWAYS
TRANSITION NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE
IAM/US Airways Transition Negotiations Grind to a Halt
Even before the IAM was certified as the collective bargaining representative for the combined US
Airways-America West Mechanic& Related and Stores workforce, we were preparing for negotiations.
We surveyed the membership and developed proposals to fairly integrate the two airlines’ employees and
negotiate contract improvements for the combined workforce. After the IAM’s certification and nearly a
year of semi-productive bargaining, both the IAM and US Airways enlisted the assistance of the National
Mediation Board in the hope of reaching an agreement.
Your negotiating committee this week presented US Airways with a comprehensive proposal that
addressed the issues the membership said they wanted addressed in these negotiations. Your committee
unanimously agreed that our proposal was the best chance for a deal and it would receive the full support
of the membership. However, US Airways response once again failed to fully address our reasonable
proposal and no future meetings are scheduled. Your negotiating committee members are returning to
their regular assignments.
US Airways has demonstrated no interest in reaching a fair agreement and unifying its Mechanic &
Related workforce. We are disappointed at US Airways’ lack of commitment to its employees and their
failure to share the airlines’ success with the employees whose sacrifices generate the airline’s profits.
There had been glimmers of hope in recent weeks because of the able assistance provided by Linda
Puchala and Dick Hanusz of the National Mediation Board. However, even their help couldn’t overcome
US Airways’ indifference toward its employees.
Throughout the negotiating process our attorneys have continued preparing for the Change of Control
arbitration, which is scheduled for September 13 -14, 2007. In fact, we were prepared to present our case
when it was originally scheduled to begin last February.
IAM members have suffered through US Airways’ refusal to participate in the original arbitration hearing
and endured the airline’s hopeless attempts to block the arbitration. The Machinists Union was successful
in convincing a judge to order the case to go forward, and District 142 is eager to finally present our case
before a neutral arbitrator.
The membership will be updated as developments occur. Thank you for your continued solidarity and
support.
Sincerely and fraternally,
Tom Higginbotham Thomas Regan Joe Adinolfi
PDGC GL Rep GL Rep
Bill Freiberger Frank Schifano Tony Giammarco
General Chairmen
Sean Ryan John Coveny Bill Wise Randy Griffith Mick Walker
Alan Rennie Ronnie White Jason Quade
Negotiating Committee
TH:tf
cc: R. Roach, Jr.
S. Pantoja
T. Brickner
District 142 Executive Board
opeiu #320
POST ON ALL IAM BULLETIN BOARDS
 
2007-100
IAM / U S AIRWAYS
TRANSITION NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE
IAM/US Airways Transition Negotiations Grind to a Halt
Even before the IAM was certified as the collective bargaining representative for the combined US
Airways-America West Mechanic& Related and Stores workforce, we were preparing for negotiations.
We surveyed the membership and developed proposals to fairly integrate the two airlines’ employees and
negotiate contract improvements for the combined workforce. After the IAM’s certification and nearly a
year of semi-productive bargaining, both the IAM and US Airways enlisted the assistance of the National
Mediation Board in the hope of reaching an agreement.
Your negotiating committee this week presented US Airways with a comprehensive proposal that
addressed the issues the membership said they wanted addressed in these negotiations. Your committee
unanimously agreed that our proposal was the best chance for a deal and it would receive the full support
of the membership. However, US Airways response once again failed to fully address our reasonable
proposal and no future meetings are scheduled. Your negotiating committee members are returning to
their regular assignments.
US Airways has demonstrated no interest in reaching a fair agreement and unifying its Mechanic &
Related workforce. We are disappointed at US Airways’ lack of commitment to its employees and their
failure to share the airlines’ success with the employees whose sacrifices generate the airline’s profits.
There had been glimmers of hope in recent weeks because of the able assistance provided by Linda
Puchala and Dick Hanusz of the National Mediation Board. However, even their help couldn’t overcome
US Airways’ indifference toward its employees.
Throughout the negotiating process our attorneys have continued preparing for the Change of Control
arbitration, which is scheduled for September 13 -14, 2007. In fact, we were prepared to present our case
when it was originally scheduled to begin last February.
IAM members have suffered through US Airways’ refusal to participate in the original arbitration hearing
and endured the airline’s hopeless attempts to block the arbitration. The Machinists Union was successful
in convincing a judge to order the case to go forward, and District 142 is eager to finally present our case
before a neutral arbitrator.
The membership will be updated as developments occur. Thank you for your continued solidarity and
support.
Sincerely and fraternally,
Tom Higginbotham Thomas Regan Joe Adinolfi
PDGC GL Rep GL Rep
Bill Freiberger Frank Schifano Tony Giammarco
General Chairmen
Sean Ryan John Coveny Bill Wise Randy Griffith Mick Walker
Alan Rennie Ronnie White Jason Quade
Negotiating Committee
TH:tf
cc: R. Roach, Jr.
S. Pantoja
T. Brickner
District 142 Executive Board
opeiu #320
POST ON ALL IAM BULLETIN BOARDS

Everyone already knew if Fleet voted down its enema, then 142 would not be involved in further negotiations. Anyways, the company should never be permitted to have a transition anyways, separate from COC, until it offers a fair and equitable agreement.

regards,
 
This the most respectful letter addressing the membership I have seen.

It did not give the entire blame of the companys failure to negotiate to
the membership like District 141.
Can we please join your district? Reading that letter makes me feel that I
am a member of a different union.
 
It will be interesting to see who is telling the truth about the M&R needing to be under one maintenance program before the single operating certificate can be issued. The IAM says they need to be under one program, The FAA says they need to be under one program, The company says no they can continue to operate "status quo" or at the very minimum have at transition agreement presented to the membership. Also Doug has said he has the right to bring the west under the east contract per the original merger agreement. Only time will tell
 
This the most respectful letter addressing the membership I have seen.

It did not give the entire blame of the companys failure to negotiate to
the membership like District 141.
Can we please join your district? Reading that letter makes me feel that I
am a member of a different union.


Learn a skill.
 
Learn a skill.


There you have it Fleet! Those three little words above speak volumes about how our fellow IAM "Brethren" and the IAM "Boss's" think about Fleet and our pecking order within the "club". Gee Mr. Superior Mechanic guy, maybe you’re right. Maybe I should go out and lean how to change a main-gear tire (with 3 of my buds to help out of course) and become just as impotent as you are (or think you are that is). That would augment my college degree quite nicely wouldn't you think? You want your dysfunctional union all to yourselves? You’re welcome to it. The cards are being distributed as of this writing. GO TEAMSTERS :up:



bird
 
That is one poster, don't take his ignorance for how everyone else thinks.

By the way an aircraft mechanic is NOT considered skilled labor.
 
Looks like the Foot Dragging is soon coming to an end.
Evidently, the company has decided on taking their chances with the arbitratror, rather than offering a fair and decent proposal. [I'm not surprised].
Since the company is responsible to the shareholders, They can now blame the arbitrator should they lose.
The company has a LOT to lose in Arbitration, while the IAM [membership] has very little to lose..[It's already been stolen]

It's just a crying shame that our so-called justice system has allowed this company to drag their feet all this time...
 
700UW

He is right, you know, when it comes to the mentality of the IAM.
That is why 142 was formed when the rampers joined.
They didnt want to share the district with the "OTHERS".
That is all we seem to be to the International. If you look
in the IAMAW Constitution, there is not a classification for our
group other than "Other Work".
That is demeaning enough. What av60 says is true.

Fleet Service brings a unique skill set to the industry.
Aircraft could not fly if we did our job incorrectly.
This perspective brings to light how we fit in the scheme
of the IAM. Alot of others are waking up to that fact!

Thanks anyway
 
That is one poster, don't take his ignorance for how everyone else thinks.

By the way an aircraft mechanic is NOT considered skilled labor.

Thanks to the unions. It has been brought up before but if we are labeled as stilled labor the rate of pay would go up. Alot of unskilled laborer is more money in the unions pocket.So you can see why they try and keep us down. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE UNIONS PUSH FOR A&P's TO BE SKILLED LABOR. Think that will happen??????? :unsure:
 
Thanks to the unions. It has been brought up before but if we are labeled as stilled labor the rate of pay would go up. Alot of unskilled laborer is more money in the unions pocket.So you can see why they try and keep us down. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE UNIONS PUSH FOR A&P's TO BE SKILLED LABOR. Think that will happen??????? :unsure:
It would take more than a push for the union........any union.

http://www.pama.org/files/Labor%20SOC%20STP%202.pdf