You guys do realize that the Association does not even exist yet. The vote will be between the IAM and the IBT ONLY. The Association only comes to fruition if/when the merger happens.
I know that no one is happy with it. Not M&R not Fleet. At AA the numbers are fairly even as far as the size of the two groups, they would have been better off saying "ok you take M&R and we will take Fleet. The Presidents I know in Fleet read the agreement, basically everyone is still appointed and they even took more say away from the elected people. Both Unions screwed up, they should have at least worked with the people the members elected and sought their input, but as usual they did not, they cooked up a deal that was best for them and their positions. They should be happy that the IBT didnt go after everyone. A union can be heavy handed and do whatever they want if they are delivering top of the industry contracts, few will care thats its not democratic or transparent if they are doing a good job at getting good wages and benefits, but when you bring back the worst deals in the industry then totally disregard the members you are setting yourself up to be decertified.
If the IBT wins at US, which I believe will happen, the Association is moot. Any mention of the association will only help the IBT get more votes, who wants their work group to be split between two unions? Isnt that the opposite of what Unionism is all about?
To me the IBT simply has much better selling points than the IAM at this point.
a) They are not the union that lowered the bar across the industry
b.) They are not the Union that made them vote on the same deal until it was passed, a deal that brought them to the bottom of the industry where they remain to this day.
c) The IBT contracts at other carriers are better than what the IAM has achieved or is even asking for. The IBT contracts provide wages that are more livable, not hollow language that says you have job security but at the lowest wages in the industry, job security is desirable if it provides Financial security, the IAM contract does not, the wages suck.
d) The IBT can make the claim that if USAIR joins them, and then AA that all the mechanics at legacy carriers will be in one union so there will be no incentive to engage in a race to the bottom in the hopes that the concessions given will allow the company where one union has members to grow faster than at a competitor. They will be able to claim that by joining the IBT they will be Uniting the profession under one union, what does the IAM have left as far as M&R in this industry? Uniting the profession under one Union has alaways been appealing to mechanics. What points other than a DB Pension that nobody trusts anymore does the IAM have?
We all knew when we entered this industry that layoffs were part of the deal, thats why once we landed a job at a major we didnt bounce around, we wanted the Seniority so we would not get laid off every year, somewhere along the way the IAM and TWU lost their way and bought into the age old company lie that if you give concessions you can save jobs. The concessions havent stopped but the job losses continue. Job losses are temporary, people eventually get recalled, because there is always an exodus of workers as people retire, die and nowadays more than ever before-quit. Yes some jobs went away permanently, but still most mechanics eventually were offered recall, and that would have happened even if the unions never gave concessions but the wages and benefits which brought us into this industry were gone and havent been seen since. So the company ended up getting everything they wanted, just as if there was no union, they got the lowest wages and cut all the jobs they wanted to. Now there is a shortage of mechanics and the only thing theses unions are left with is "We have more mechanics working per airplane than anyone else" Yes but at the lowest wages in the industry. Well when we went looking for a job was "more mechanics oper airplane" anywhere on our list of what we wanted out of a job? Do they really think that it will be on any mechanics list of what they want from their Union? Like I siad if our goal was to work for the employer with the most employees then we would be looking to work for Walmart, and not be paying $700 a year for a Union to negotiate deals that added heads at the cost of wages and benefits.
The IAM has eight weeks to convince their guys that they realize that they screwed up, they gave away too much and they are going to do whatever it takes to get their guys industry leading wages and benefits like they used to. I think its too late. They should have demanded to be released when management left them sitting at the table to go talk to the unions at AA. They still collected their dues while their guys waited, waited and waited for them to make a move, they waited too long. They lost their guys, now they are going to lose their dues.