US1YFARE
Veteran
- Mar 31, 2004
- 3,932
- 54
No no nodidn't you know . we are the industry leaders of followers. lol
You don't even follow
If you did, your product would be better
You are indeed laggards in this industry thanks to the DoUgIe.
No no nodidn't you know . we are the industry leaders of followers. lol
Well why would US want to be like CO???? They are the leader in the industry. US is not a follower, just a laggard.
Who is more 'superior' of the 2? Who is in 'control' of the entire plane?
EMBFA,
Thank you for the explanation. I found it interesting that you thought I was traveling on an Asian carrier. That however was not the case. I was on a US carrier. The route should tell you who that carrier is. And I must say the service and experience was very similar to what I have had from Asian carriers.
That said, even if the position is little more than perception, I think it requires adequate staffing first of all in order to be effective--and we all know that this may be an issue when US tries it.
If there was dedicated CSD program that I think would be great, however the AFA would oppose the creation of such because if would create "SUPER SENIORITY" amongst the flight attendant group. AFA won the greveiance against the company when they tried to give the LOD/Os super seniority. The closet thing was when there was the TA Division that created consistancy in a product when our international service was an award winning product. Because you only flew transatlantic for a minimum of one year your knew what the product was because that is all you did. Now you can could in from a 4 day today and tomorrow fly to Rome. The transatlantic service use to be like a well chorograph ballet. If was really interesting to see because everybody knew what to do and when to do it. It was consistant.