What's new

Stand In Stead

Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Anyone notice that the company slipped in a letter from Gary Yingest dated '04 that doesn't allow for the 12.5k to be given to title 1 persons.. Wasn't this a 1 time letter of agreement back then as part of consessions we gave back, same as mechs go back to shops during layoff loosing lic. pay.......
 
Anyone notice that the company slipped in a letter from Gary Yingest dated '04 that doesn't allow for the 12.5k to be given to title 1 persons.. Wasn't this a 1 time letter of agreement back then as part of consessions we gave back, same as mechs go back to shops during layoff loosing lic. pay.......


You surely don't expect lowly dues paying members to have answers or current knowledge regarding TWU side letters of agreement?

You're kidding...right?
 
Did not see it but is it so suprising? What about the job protection clause. I would think the job protection clause was to discourage or reduce the amount of people laid off. (TWU looking after their membership :lol: )Well what happened 3 years ago to the TWU job protection clause? The protection date got moved because it was such a strain on the cash strapped company. It is a joke. It will move again. Layoffs are hard on everyone why make it less painful for the company? TWU one step better than no Union! (That was not an endorsement)
 
Back
Top