Today's Interesting News

USA320Pilot

Veteran
May 18, 2003
8,175
1,539
www.usaviation.com
 AFA tentative agreement balloting closes today at 4:00 p.m. The AFA uses BallotPoint and the electronic voting results will be available shortly thereafter. Union leaders have told the news media they expect the agreement to be passed by a majority of its members.

 According to today’s Pittsburgh Post Gazette, “Aircraft makers Embraer and Bombardier have reached new agreements with US Airways to finance the purchase of six new regional jets while the airline is still in bankruptcy. US Airways spokesman Amy Kudwa said, ‘This is another indication that (both of) our (RJ) business partners have confidence in our restructuring efforts.’ The agreements are separate from a large order US Airways placed with both manufacturers in the spring of 2003,â€￾ the newspaper reported. This is a key development for US Airways group and both PSA and MDA, with the new 70 or 90 seat jets used to backfill ASM’s lost with the GE deal. The new agreement raises the number to three key creditors who are supporting the new business plan with additional financing while the airline operates in bankruptcy.

 US Airways announced today that January bookings are ahead of last year's pace.

See Story

 Last night Reuters reported US Airways will try to short circuit any attempt by machinists to strike, by filing an injunction, if a federal court allows the carrier to throw out their contract, a senior company official said on Tuesday. The executive, who spoke on the condition he not be named, said the airline will ask a Virginia bankruptcy judge to prohibit a walkout (on Thursday). The company believes a strike over the contract would violate US labor law.â€￾ A spokesman for theIAM, Frank Larkin, said on Tuesday the group was still trying to negotiate concessions even though the situation was not promising. He played down talk of a strike. "You don't want to scare passengers away, or misinform employees about our intentions," Larkin said. "Our goal is to reach an agreement to be ratified. It's not unusual for difficult negotiations to go down to the wire." Creditors, vendors and lenders, which include the government, are demanding that the airline secure the labor concessions immediately to obtain new savings on aircraft leases, debt and other operating costs.

 The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette also reported Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato and Gov. Ed Rendell will talk to US Airways Chief Executive Officer Bruce Lakefield this week as part of their bid to keep the airline's reservations center in the Pittsburgh area. US Airways is planning to close either the Greentree center or one in Winston-Salem, N.C., as part of a consolidation plan. Politicians and economic development officials in North Carolina and Pennsylvania have been working to keep those jobs in their respective states. The two officials also are trying to keep US Airways maintenance facilities in Pittsburgh, as well. The airline has indicated in bankruptcy documents that it intends to close one of its centers -- the other is in Charlotte, N.C. -- to save $40 million a year.

Regards,

USA320Pilot
 
USA320Pilot said:
 According to today’s Pittsburgh Post Gazette, “Aircraft makers Embraer and Bombardier have reached new agreements with US Airways to finance the purchase of six new regional jets while the airline is still in bankruptcy. US Airways spokesman Amy Kudwa said, ‘This is another indication that (both of) our (RJ) business partners have confidence in our restructuring efforts.’ The agreements are separate from a large order US Airways placed with both manufacturers in the spring of 2003,â€￾ the newspaper reported. This is a key development for US Airways group and both PSA and MDA, with the new 70 or 90 seat jets used to backfill ASM’s lost with the GE deal. The new agreement raises the number to three key creditors who are supporting the new business plan with additional financing while the airline operates in bankruptcy.
[post="235627"][/post]​

The agreement with Embraer is Docket #1517 and the agreement with Bombardier is Docket #1519.

Both agreements are similiar. Deposits and progress payments made in connection with undelivered aircraft ordered after BK1 will be applied toward the purchase price of the aircraft covered by these agreements (3 CRJ-700's from Bombardier and 6 Emb-170's from Embraer). The remainder will be financed by DVB Bank (the CRJ's) and Embraer (the 170's)

The delivery schedule for these 9 aircraft requires that the 3 CRJ's and 3 of the Emb-170's be delivered by 1/31/05 with the remaining 3 Emb-170's delivered by 3/31/05.

The Embraer agreement effectively cancels the remainder of the orders we placed with them after BK1 (we had 85 firm orders and 85 options) and allows Embraer to remarket those delivery positions. A revised delivery schedule can be negotiated at a later time.

Financing terms are LIBOR + 4.75% for the Embraers and LIBOR + 5% for the CRJ's. The Embraer agreement requires U to receive a B- credit rating upon emergence from BK.

It appears that the agreement with Embraer encompasses a 1110 agreement for the 7 Emb-170's that are already on the property flying at MDA.

Jim
 
Where is the moderator on this one? Here USA320PILOT is quoting all of these stories, and they seem to be missing in action!

Step up to the plate boys, and do you duty! What's fair for one, SHOULD be fair for all, in which case, end this thread now!
 
Imamec said:
Where is the moderator on this one? Here USA320PILOT is quoting all of these stories, and they seem to be missing in action!

Step up to the plate boys, and do you duty! What's fair for one, SHOULD be fair for all, in which case, end this thread now!
[post="235659"][/post]​

Dude, your allowed as long as the credit is given to the writer. In this case the article and name are given...
 
Imamec said:
Where is the moderator on this one? Here USA320PILOT is quoting all of these stories, and they seem to be missing in action!

Step up to the plate boys, and do you duty! What's fair for one, SHOULD be fair for all, in which case, end this thread now!
[post="235659"][/post]​

Ummm....He posted excerpts and posted the link to the article. More than I can say about your postings.
 
Here's something from the CLT Observer's "Flying Standby" column:

CEO visits Charlotte airport

US Airways CEO Bruce Lakefield paid a quick visit to Charlotte/Douglas International Airport on Tuesday, thanking employees for their hard work the past few weeks.He also fielded a wide range of questions from US Airways workers, some of whom said they had never before met an airline CEO. His appearance was not previously announced to employees or the media.

In impromptu discussions with baggage handlers, Lakefield said he felt as though he was "putting Chapstick on and kissing ass," said baggage handler Barbara Zimberg. The airline has cut workers' pay by 21 percent and proposed outsourcing thousands of jobs.

"He said he's had to do that with a lot of different areas lately, not just us," she said. "He's had to do it with everybody." -- TONY MECIA

Flying Standby (free subscription)

Jim
 
 Last night Reuters reported US Airways will try to short circuit any attempt by machinists to strike, by filing an injunction, if a federal court allows the carrier to throw out their contract, a senior company official said on Tuesday. The executive, who spoke on the condition he not be named, said the airline will ask a Virginia bankruptcy judge to prohibit a walkout (on Thursday). The company believes a strike over the contract would violate US labor law.â€￾

This is an area that has never been tested. I look for a lock-out myself, impose a contract on a group and then tell them they cannot strike.........sounds like slavery to me!!!! :down: I guess its time for all to go strickly by the books!! :up: Let the Feds know they will have to add a few more lines to their hotline call center!!! Good luck to all!!!!!
 
AP Tech said:
impose a contract on a group and then tell them they cannot strike.........sounds like slavery to me!!!!

Technically, you wouldn't have a contract imposed. You'd have work rules imposed. You are free to walk from that. Drawing a parallel between your job situation and slavery is ludicrous and a slap in the face to anyone who's ancestors actually WERE slaves. Get a clue. Better yet, get another job that you might actually be happy in.

Many of us work in non-union positions in all sectors of the economy. As such, we've seen our benefits slashed, copayments and payroll deductions for healthcare increased and salaries cut or frozen. Just go to www.thevault.com and search for any big-name company and you'll find plenty of griping employees. But guess what - they're still working so the pay must be better than none at all.
 
well then if they negate the strike threat in court i don't think the nasty mechanics would do anything such as an unsanctioned job action now would they??
they used to have a term back in the old days...how was it...ah i think its something like "sticking aluminum up an orfice"
or "aluminum suppositories"..if i remember correctly.
 
Sorry boys and girls but I plan on riding this thig into the ground!!!!!! They are discussing the Delta fare cuts on CNBC as we speak and saying it may lead to the demise of USAirways. Bend over they will soon be coming back for more.
 
BoeingBoy said:
Financing terms are LIBOR + 4.75% for the Embraers and LIBOR + 5% for the CRJ's.
[post="235647"][/post]​
:shock: Ouch! That's some pricey financing. Guess that's what a couple of bankruptcies will do for you.
 
Are these airplanes in addition to the 9 CRJ's that were announced a few weeks ago, in the 31 airplane finance deal??? Which would make it 12 CRJ's and 6 170's coming to the express carriers?
 
BoeingBoy said:
The Embraer agreement effectively cancels the remainder of the orders we placed with them after BK1 (we had 85 firm orders and 85 options) and allows Embraer to remarket those delivery positions. A revised delivery schedule can be negotiated at a later time.

Jim: Are there more details on this? It seems a little confusing. It sounds, from your description, that the firm orders are not "cancelled", but rather they are being delayed to new delivery dates to be determined later.

Are these aircraft really cancelled? or just delayed?
 
PHL said:
Many of us work in non-union positions in all sectors of the economy. As such, we've seen our benefits slashed, copayments and payroll deductions for healthcare increased and salaries cut or frozen. Just go to www.thevault.com and search for any big-name company and you'll find plenty of griping employees. But guess what - they're still working so the pay must be better than none at all.
[post="235738"][/post]​

Perhaps they need a union :p
 

Latest posts