What's new

Turn out the lights...

Little slip there....terrorist was in the singular (Osama Bin Laden or al Queada), which is the war we SHOULD have focused on. Instead we find ourselves in a country that had nothing to do with the attack on the US, based on what they "might" do, and by doing so, have INCREASED the terrorist presence rather than reduce it. Meanwhile, bin laden is still walking. And with hindsight being 20/20, we can pretty much safely say that invading Iraq was a mistake. So in my mind, the question becomes, do we want a leader that is willing to weigh all the options INCLUDING forming a coalition, or do we want to vote for a candidate who has sort of shown his hand when he sang "Bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran"? I think I'll err on the side of caution.


Pssssttt. You forgot to mention that going into Iraq made Iran stronger since we were kind enough to take out their one mortal enemy.
 
Big 'O':
Flag pin


That one pisses me off. I am not sure I believe his reason for wearing one but I wish he would have stuck to his guns on this issue. The flag pin is right up there with the ribbons on cars in terms of the 'stupid asinine useless gestures" meter.
 
Given that McSame was a part of that Congress for the entire 8 years (there's that experience thing) and his 'plan' appears mighty close to the Bush policies, then yeah, I think that I might be willing to let Obama have a shot at it.

Do you think there may be a chance Obama's administration could make things worse?
 
That one pisses me off. I am not sure I believe his reason for wearing one but I wish he would have stuck to his guns on this issue. The flag pin is right up there with the ribbons on cars in terms of the 'stupid asinine useless gestures" meter.

Some call it pride in ones country.
 
The economy is a little shaky,do you want to vote in an unknown(Obama) to handle it or a better known(McCain)?

We are in a war against terrorist, do you want to vote in an unknown(Obama) to handle it or a better known(McCain)?

When we win the "war against terror", who surrenders or waves the white flag.

That is a Bush created term, and I hope it ends with his presidential fiasco.

Wars are against nations or people, not some inanimate object.
 
OK I give up. You tell me how we defend ourselves from those who wish us dead.


For a start we could go to where they are at such as Saudi Arabia and not where they are not such as ...... wanna guess? I know you know the answer.

I wonder why we did not go to Saudi Arabia ... OH yea, they are our friends who have OIL but who also support terrorism against the USA .......shuuuuuuuuuuuuush don't tell anyone.
 
OK I give up. You tell me how we defend ourselves from those who wish us dead.
I can tell you this...when you invade a country that didn't do anything to you, you aren't helping to reduce the numbers of folks who want to see you dead. You are only increasing them.
 
For a start we could go to where they are at such as Saudi Arabia and not where they are not such as ...... wanna guess? I know you know the answer.

Well I don't suppose we just go into Saudi Arabia and find terrorists. We would probably have to invade them to get the job done. That would be invading a sovereign nation even though the terrorists don't fight for a particular nation. Do you think that would fix the terror situation?
 
I can tell you this...when you invade a country that didn't do anything to you, you aren't helping to reduce the numbers of folks who want to see you dead.

Yeah I know, Iraq was just a harmless little country that took pot shots at our jets doing fly overs. I wonder why they never let us do a real good search for WMD. Geez Saddam, that had to be your worst bluff ever.....................

You are only increasing them.

That is your opinion....................... I guess time will tell.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top