What's new

Unveil new A321 colors

You have to repaint planes every few years no matter what. Some of those planes are wearing decade old paint jobs- they'd need to be touched up anyway, and it's be much cheaper than applying a cheesy new one. It also would have been far cheaper to just paint the smaller west fleet, which was the original plan. However, they had to appease the desert crowd by putting tacky swooshes or heat waves or whatever. They used the ridiculous excuse that you can't fly dark colored planes into hot places. Uh, yeah OK. Rather than hire a professional firm to update it, or even adapt some of the better fanmade ones, the usual taste-challenged crowd sat around with Paintshop and came up with this travesty. They'll outsource all of our jobs but they had to do this in-house, after a few beers by the looks of it. It goes against all design rules, clashes terribly, and is completely uninspired. So, yeah, I guess it does represent the airline well.

I could have done a better job on my computer here at the house. I have an Art Degree and specialize in graphics. Paintshop would have done a hell of of job if they had hired someone out of high school. 🙄

In fact, I could have done a better job when I was in high school and didn't have the wonderful tools that are now available. <_<
 
Let's not forget it's a direct rip-off of whatever the hell "Leisure Air" was...

0167033.jpg


People at home with paintshop or whatever did do a better job... I would have gone with this one. It's fresh and sporty, but they might have thought it was too professional or global looking.

silver.jpg
 
I seen that tail and I saw Microsoft. I would think trademark infringement there. So does the Swoosh on the "New Colors", I am surprised that NIKE doesn't go after US for that. Unless they just have the design trademarked. What's next, is Michael Vick going to be the spokesperson for US when he comes out of jail, I heard he finances animals. At least he and DoUgIe can share experiences, what its like to be behind bars. Though DoUgIe isn't Brave enough to go to a "real" jail.
 
#### #### ####....this looks WAY better than the old "blue on tops"...besides, I'm sure this saves at least some fuel, especially out west where it gets nice an toasty.
 
Those alternative designs (with the windows logo on the tail) look a little too much like Delta.

I must be in the minority who likes the new paint scheme fleetwide. Although I thought the deep blue one used since 1997 looked pretty cool when new, but the fading really makes a plane look like crap (e.g. today's 737).

Here's a question - does the new paint job weigh any less than the old? Maybe that's the only saving grace for this pig of an airplane.
 
you guys really make me laugh? your gonna complain about the 321 being painted in the new livery now? gimmie a break.


Don't You Know By Now..These Same People Complain About EVERYTHING That Has To Do With US..I Betcha They Still Complain About US If and When We Are No Longer US!! :blink:
 
Not overly fond of the NEW livery, but getting used to it.......I DO prefer this one with the exception of the tail. Personally I think the smaller airplanes E170/190, 737s and A319/320s look fine as do the 757s. The wide bodies look very blah and the whole colour scheme looks out of proportion. And as far as The SWOOSH........I actually like it. (Afterall, Nike Tracksuits are soon to debut........maybe we will be doing joint marketing with them. I can see it now a new advertising venture......drumroll.... "USAirways, JUST DO IT!" :lol:
 
I think the problem with the new livery is that it is totally inconsistent with the wordmark and the logo.

They look totally out of place with the new livery.

Dump the iron flag and the Times New Roman wordmark, finding a way to integrate the wordmark into the swoosh.

Then integrate the 'red tip' on the tail with the swoosh and call it a day. It'll still be not great but better. Right now, when I look at the paint scheme, I suspect that management is not expecting USAirways to be named 'US Airways' for much longer.
 
You really think some other airline would keep that ghetto trash livery? Please
 
On the design I posted above (not sure who did that originally) the “waving flagâ€￾ was meant to be on the flag post of the “yâ€￾ in Airways. An interesting idea, but not well executed in this example. In my eyes it looks tattered from being in a hurricane.

A serif font on any white aircraft just does not look right, so this logotype is somewhat better, although generic.

Now the overall color scheme is really attractive, especially for a true LCC. Perhaps too informal for a global premium carrier.





<SNIP> Right now, when I look at the paint scheme, I suspect that management is not expecting USAirways to be named 'US Airways' for much longer.
I think that when I look at the whole scope of the operation, LOL.
 
it's interesting the complaints about the new look. if anyone really cared to admit it - it really looks pretty good. I imagine if the company had outsourced the "creative" work to create a new aircraft livery - I bet this board would be filled with postings on how management is wasting money by outsourcing. I don't thing Tempe can win. before you attack - I'm not drinking the kool aide just pointing out a different way at looking at things.

P.S. - although i do agree that the 321 might still be a pig
 

Latest posts

Back
Top