GorgeousGeorge
Senior
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 326
- Reaction score
- 357
But not in the immediate future, it would appear.
Another East "shrink-to-profitability", "go backwards" permanent base bid was just published for February. Fewer lines, fewer pilots...
If the operations remain separate, and the East keeps publishing permanent base bids like the ones over the past several years, the East will eventually disappear altogether, and the West's problem will be solved.
Sorry, but that isn't exclusive to the EAST but based on the schedule reductions and furloughs currently being enacted and it sure isn't as bad on the East. DEC makes 1st anniversary of age 65 and at some point, early retirements will come into play. The one in APR/MAY of next year will be representative of where things are headed for 09. It will include begging of staffing the 5 A330-200's going East as well as increased Trans Atlantic with PHL-TLV, CLT-CDG, PHL-OSL, PHL-BHX and the rest of the seasonal European shift. Unlike the bid you reference where only 5 furloughs account for the 30+ reduction in head count(the rest were mostly medical and a few early retirement), it will be interesting to see how the future bid accounts for the higher staffing requirements for international bid positions as well what will likely be an increasing number of people leaving the bid via medical and more early retirements because of the longevity of the East group.
If you are truly concerned about a "shrink to profitability", "go backwards" scenario, I would look to the past for placement of your concerns. Does AA/AirCal, US/PSA, ring a bell? Given the current economic weakness, I know which flying I would be more concerned about being at risk. It isn't PHL, CLT, BOS, DCA, or LGA.