dariencc
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 1,284
- Reaction score
- 1,912
The way I see it, there are 3 different issues here.
#1 is captains authority.
#2 is whether or not a few captains were abusing their authority to "stick it to the man."
#3 is how USAPA handles these affairs.
Regardless of where you stand on #2 and #3, issue #1 is important enough to make allowances for 2 & 3. It's not like these guys were taking fuel OFF the flight plan. That would be a totally different scenario all together. But as long as a decision is made to err on the side of caution, or to be extra conservative, and does not compromise safety, then captains authority must remain intact.
Just my 2 pennies. Carry on.
I never thought I would be saying this. 767Jetz has provided the most cogent contribution to this discussion.

I would also add a #4 to the list. Training must be be kept out of the discipline game. That is not their role. The trust between that department and the line is something to be protected, Robert Isom be damned.