A lot of misinformation, direct. And until your honest about whats said, written or done, theres not much point in reasonable debate.
Please point out where I am not "being honest about what's said". Are you saying that there is no one on the east that is angry? That no one on these boards are not hostile toward the west?
Id say neither side has a monopoly on "anger-talk," direct. But with the turn-downs in jumpseats of our PHX and SAN commuters, Id say youve got the upper hand on acting out your anger.
Oh I would call the temper tantrum over the fuel issue, the irrelevant vote of no confidence of management and the malicious RICO charges acting pretty angry.
And why no west Reps? You intimidate the few who have stepped forward. You want input?
Where did I say that I wanted input? I said that you do not have to comprise with us because no one from the west is there.
Where he say/write that? Please, start quoting any official documents to back up any ot your statements. One thing our attorney and our union doesnt do is make promises. And opposite you former leadership, they dont launch attacks on fellow pilots.
USAPA update September 9, 2008
You may have heard by now that on September 4th, six West pilots filed a complaint against US Airways and USAPA in the federal district court in Phoenix, Arizona. The complaint asserts two claims against the Company, and one claim against USAPA. Following a preliminary review of the Verified Complaint, our law firm has determined that it has no legal merit.
QUOTE Seeham told you that you will prevail in the appeal on the RICO charges.
No, he never promised us a win there, either. But feel free to cite a document backing up your statement.
Item One: On August 6, 2008, USAPA filed the necessary documents to initiate an appeal in its litigation against AWAPPA and its co-defendants.
As we have previously communicated to the pilot group, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the action based on the argument that the federal court did not have jurisdiction over the matter. Significantly, for the purposes of the defendants´ motion, the federal court actually assumed the truth of all factual allegations, including those paragraphs alleging that the defendants had engaged in criminal threats of physical retaliation, sending excrement in the mail, and criminal acts of electronic and telephonic sabotage. Nevertheless, on technical grounds, the federal court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the sole federal cause of action under the civil RICO statute. The court dismissed the state causes of action without prejudice and granted USAPA leave to file these causes of action in state court.
Instead of filing in state court, USAPA has decided to appeal the federal court's decision. The decision to appeal was based both on our determination that the federal court's technical decision was in error and our desire to pursue the remedies available under the RICO statute, including treble damages and attorney's fees. In short, we believe that the defendants should reimburse USAPA for all costs and fees associated with the alleged criminal activity.
If USAPA prevails on the appeal, the case will be remanded to federal court for further proceeding. If USAPA does not prevail, the applicable limitations period will allow sufficient time to re-file the action in the appropriate state court.
Are you saying that USAPA has no reason "No legal merit" to pursue an appeal. The only reason they are continuing to maliciously attack individual pilots is for the fun and vindictiveness of it? It Seeham does not think that he will win than is he just wasting money and running up the bill? People do not file appeals unless they think that they can win. Or does USAPA have a losing strategy in mind?
QUOTE The company is furloughing 10% of the west and only 3% of the east. That leaves east new hires on the property while west pilots that were here before the merger are out.
Not quite so, direct. Maybe for a month or so, but when the furloughs are done with,
When will that be? What month will all of the new hires be off the property? As of Nov. 1 about 95 west pilots will be gone. That is Dave Odell and 75 pilots that were here prior to the merger. On Nov 1 how many new hires will still be employed on the east. New hires guys that are the third list of the transition agreement? For all of the east yelling about seniority I find it amazing that now no one has a problem with this. Yes quite possibly in 6 months those east new hires will be gone. Out of the 125 that have received a furlough letter. Would it be acceptable to the east to furlough more senior people just because they are in a different airplane. Eventually they would get to everyone but the company wanted to go out of order. Any problem with that?
Your words, direct. Not shared by us or found on this board, but typical of the Macalvena strategy of telling the big lie enough, maybe your own cronies believe it and act even more childish. Snooper
Again why the name calling? "childish, big lie" The east pilots are in control. Correct? What is the big lie you speak of? Is the west secretly in charge? You may not feel like the east is in charge but if not you who is?