I'm just a retarded semi-frequent flyer who works an office job who travels for both business and leisure....just though I should qualify myself.
I've been reading this site for a while, and it works me into a rage in almost every thread. The infighting among east vs west, gate agents vs. flight attendants, ex-employees vs. current ones, possibly mgmt. vs. line workers.
To read this from an oblivious and unbiased point of view its seems completely ridiculous with 100% of people to blame, from Parker down to the reserve flight attendants (not insinuating you guys are at the bottom, you just seem to b;tch the most).
My simple question is, why are you unionized, other than "that's the way its always been". I read something in another thread that a union is only as good as its weakest link....how true, and how sad for anyone thinking that a union is benefitting them.
Make management pay you what your worth, not what a bunch of spineless people who don't want to work determine your worth. It sorts itself out, especially when people can easily be fired if they don't meet performance standards. You want productive people, pay them for it.
Essentially, all I here is that people are not doing their job because they think they're underpaid. The truth is, your paid what the "weakest" member is worth, which is not much IMO.
I'd much rather have my pilot worrying about his performance to get promoted rather than just going through the motions wondering when someone above him will retire.
As an office worker, I have hard time fathoming the usefulness of a union. I'm paid well because I perform well. People who don't perform well are fired, or at least aren't promoted. I don't b;itch when my boss asks me to do a job that isn't my primary responsibility. I do what I'm asked because I know it reflects well on me. Unions negate this because extra effort is never rewarded, and underachieving is rarely punished.
Now I'm expecting 50 people to tell me how this wouldn't work as airlines are a different business, but stop drinking your own union kool-aid and think about it. What has the union ever gotten for you in terms of rewarding you for performance?
I'm sure many will say that management will just fire everyone and hire the cheapest alternative. Perhaps, but this would be a much quicker education for them than this painful death now.....and I can bet you that they will be calling all the managers asking who was worthwhile so they can hire them back...and then, when you're needed, that's when you'll get the respect and pay that you deserve.
Remember, in order for Doug to get his golden parachute as many of you feel is the end goal, he needs an operating airline.
I've been reading this site for a while, and it works me into a rage in almost every thread. The infighting among east vs west, gate agents vs. flight attendants, ex-employees vs. current ones, possibly mgmt. vs. line workers.
To read this from an oblivious and unbiased point of view its seems completely ridiculous with 100% of people to blame, from Parker down to the reserve flight attendants (not insinuating you guys are at the bottom, you just seem to b;tch the most).
My simple question is, why are you unionized, other than "that's the way its always been". I read something in another thread that a union is only as good as its weakest link....how true, and how sad for anyone thinking that a union is benefitting them.
Make management pay you what your worth, not what a bunch of spineless people who don't want to work determine your worth. It sorts itself out, especially when people can easily be fired if they don't meet performance standards. You want productive people, pay them for it.
Essentially, all I here is that people are not doing their job because they think they're underpaid. The truth is, your paid what the "weakest" member is worth, which is not much IMO.
I'd much rather have my pilot worrying about his performance to get promoted rather than just going through the motions wondering when someone above him will retire.
As an office worker, I have hard time fathoming the usefulness of a union. I'm paid well because I perform well. People who don't perform well are fired, or at least aren't promoted. I don't b;itch when my boss asks me to do a job that isn't my primary responsibility. I do what I'm asked because I know it reflects well on me. Unions negate this because extra effort is never rewarded, and underachieving is rarely punished.
Now I'm expecting 50 people to tell me how this wouldn't work as airlines are a different business, but stop drinking your own union kool-aid and think about it. What has the union ever gotten for you in terms of rewarding you for performance?
I'm sure many will say that management will just fire everyone and hire the cheapest alternative. Perhaps, but this would be a much quicker education for them than this painful death now.....and I can bet you that they will be calling all the managers asking who was worthwhile so they can hire them back...and then, when you're needed, that's when you'll get the respect and pay that you deserve.
Remember, in order for Doug to get his golden parachute as many of you feel is the end goal, he needs an operating airline.