you can't get past the realization that the JFK-TLV flight is funded by the NRT-JFK flight, can you? DL doesn't intend to have a plane sitting at JFK for 20 hours off of the NRT flight and they also don't intend to do the same thing in reverse for TLV.
feel free to go chase someone else's warm nuts.
DL is downgrading TLV, you knew it would happen when they loaded the JFK-NRT downgrade, and you are simply being juvenile to be unable to accept that out of dozens of int'l routes, cutting 90 seats off of one flight is a drop in the bucket.
700 is right.
you're a troll.
I have acknowledged that US does well.
however, DL currently operates and will continue to operate more seats than US to TLV unless AA/US add another flight.
DL's yields relative to US' are such that DL will remain the 2nd largest US carrier to TLV>
despite all the fantasies with AA starting another flight, it hasn't been announced.