Airlinelifer
Senior
- Jan 10, 2008
- 333
- 142
The pendulum has swung.It is for someone who has a one-sided viewpoint..
people will absolutely feel she is biased (even if that is not the case at all) based simply on her title of being a former President, this was clearly not the best move that could have been made at this time...when thinking long term and overall fairness for all, and the perception of balance..
that is why neutrality would have been the key regarding this appointment..
they cannot remove one person who may have a former tie with a company(while some claimed conflict of interest) and then replace the position with another who has a former tie to a union being a President..
it appears very hypocritical.
I believe she is very well suited to be a mediator based on experience, but the actual nomination of overseeing an election may be an issue at her confimation..