Earnings
In 2013, among full-time wage and salary workers, union members had median
usual weekly earnings of $950, while those who were not union members had
median weekly earnings of $750. In addition to coverage by a collective
bargaining agreement, this earnings difference reflects a variety of
influences, including variations in the distributions of union members and
nonunion employees by occupation, industry, firm size, or geographic region.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
So citing my original mathematical example once again.
You guys make $850 per week.
NON UNION %480 per week.
----------------------------
Difference of $370 per week.
So the average Union against non union makes $200.00 per week more.
And you guys are making $170.00 per week more than that report.
Putting that into perspective even after all the BK givebacks I would have to say
that your union is still doing a pretty good job. DON'T YOU THINK!!!!
And how many very hard working people never get that lucky break or are downsized due to no fault of their own? Lot's of hard luck stories to set the dirge to and they have all the education you could pack in that briefcase of yours man.737823 said:How many of the wealthiest, most successful and most powerful people relied on unions to get to where they are today? It was through education and hardwork many achieved their success.
Josh
Robbed I can tell you right now that there are those out there who will try to deceive you into believing that DAL employees are better off than the Union represented ones. I can promise that that is not the case. It's very easy to look at the top out base rate and think everyone is making that They absolutely are not. I have talked to some DAL people who have told me what the reality is on how many make that top rate. We (AA and USAir) have far more than they do.robbedagain said:weaasles that's excellent way bro of putting it. that cld also bold for companies like DL not sure what theyre top out rate is but then compare it to the top out of a union company and the union working would most likely come out on top am I correct Weaasles
OT within the airline industry is almost guaranteed. But only a complete numbskull should be considering that as a part of their income. And yes I do understand that many have gotten themselves into the positions where they have no choice but to try and rely on it survive. But it was never meant to be that.Kev3188 said:We need to stop thinking of OT as part of our income. Capital uses it as a way to rationalize concessions and short staffing both. We make their job easy.
The goal should be total compensation packages that negate any "need" to work more than one's 40.
No I'm not amazed and I'm very sorry that these people are in those positions. Thankfully I'm not. And yes I am just a clerk who lives on clerk wages.Kev3188 said:I think we'd both be amazed at how many bank on it (no pun intended)...
This vote in june will probably be a record turnout. Much more than the nominations. It will be a record turnout partly because of trying to keep most of the incumbents in and partly to keep the UFC out........jmopjirish317 said:tim,
I didn't ask how secure you felt about phx. I asked how many people showed up at the local to nominate artie and your ticket? If you do not know that's ok, but my guess is less than 100. Doesn't really speak for all of phx now does it. PRez, do you know how many showed up at the local for nominations in phx?