Claxon said:
america west pilots seek to take positions 17 yrs ahead of their hire date, west pilots take jobs of Australian pilots, west pilots agree to bottom of barrel contracts for decades. west pilots have no pension, cheer when others lose theirs. A sad legacy.
What are your plans for furloughed Legacy American pilots? It is a closely guarded plan, for it will awaken the LAA pilots to the threat to their careers PHX pilots pose.
You need to get you facts right, Jack.
West pilots aren't taking positions, we went thorough a process called arbitration.
Facts from the arbitration include:
"At the time of the US Air/America West merger, US Airways had a grand total of
5098 pilots on its seniority list, 1691 of which (33%) were on furlough.'
Their dates of hire (DOH) ranged from 4/20/66 to 6/19/00, with the
most senior furloughed pilot (Colello) having been hired in 1988. When
furloughed in 2003, Colello (3303) had 16.4 years of service"
"As of the merger, it America West) had 1894 pilots on its
list. All, however, were active and less than 200 had spent time on
furlough and then for relatively short periods during the early and mid-
90s, at which point hiring resumed with 1131 additional pilots added to
the list."
So, your furloughed pilot, Usapian Collelo with 16.4 years of service appears to be junior with your airline. He's on the Uscaba merger committee (what a suprise) to justify replacing an actively flying pilot who brought a job to the table in 2005. Usapian Collelo wants to take that job from a pilot who's company was hiring at the time, seems convenient. You bring a job, you keep it and despite your arguments at the time, they were rejected by the panel as they should have been.
The West Merger Comittee has spelled it out. Have you not been paying attention, Clax?
THE NICOLAU AWARD
"Many of you rightfully are bit fuzzy as to the status of the Nicolau Award after the latest iteration of court battles and arbitrations, and have asked us to explain how the Nicolau Award might become part of the new American Airlines seniority list.
During the SLI process ahead of us, each of the three merger committees (AA, East, and West) will likely present different ideas of how the final American Airlines seniority list should be integrated. Ultimately, it will be up to a panel of three highly-seasoned arbitrators to determine which portion(s) (if any) of each proposal meet the fair and equitable standard as they attempt to craft their award. An important part of this process will be determining the relative ordering of East and West pilots into that final American Airlines seniority list, and of course, it is for that reason APA established (and American supported) separate East and West committees for this process. Both the East and West committees will present their views as to the relative ordering of the East and West pilots, and it will be up to the arbitration panel to decide how that should be done.
Our position is simple. The pre-merger stand-alone career expectations of America West and US Airways pilots were set and measured in May 2005 when the merger of those two airlines was announced. From that point on, we began working for a new airline (LCC) with new career expectations, and agreed to equitably divide the benefits of our new airline according to a well-recognized, fair and equitable seniority integration process. Both pilot groups participated in the process in good faith and without a single objection to any part of the process itself. The process ended with a result, and that result remains the ONLY combined East/West seniority list ever reached by mutual East/West agreement, and it is the ONLY combined East/West seniority list ever accepted by US Airways. That seniority list, the Nicolau Award, can therefore be the ONLY fair and equitable basis for integrating US Airways pilots with American Airlines pilots. The fact that it was never implemented is of no moment; it reflected the balancing of pre-merger stand-alone career expectations of the two pilot groups then and it still does today.
On the other hand, the USAPA approach, in a nutshell, was best characterized by Arbitrator Javits during the Preliminary Arbitration when he asked this of USAPA Merger Committee Chairman Jess Pauley:
I
guess the gravamen of the questions is are you then putting yourself in the place of Nicolau, are you the new Nicolau because you are proposing a list which may not reflect Nicolau's list?"
There's the plan. It appears you don't have one that's going to impress the arbitrators if history is an indication. Having no plan other than complaining about the Nicolau list is not a plan. It's a hole in which you will get buried.