What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
untitled-article-1429794386.png
 
Monkee said:
 
Hmm...I'm not sure that even "Dr. Phil" accepts gifs, but you can at least try to submit that as your opener, I suppose. 😉 A moment's curiosity here though: do you truly see yourself as nothing more lasting and substantial than a cloud?
 
Monkee said:
Gosh, you are so edgy.
 
Have another drink, maybe someone will respect you.
 
I doubt it.
Do you think after reading the APA C&R boards that any American Airline legacy pilot has any respect for the west pilots?  (rhetorical question)
 
Claxon said:
Do you think after reading the APA C&R boards that any American Airline legacy pilot has any respect for the west pilots?  (rhetorical question)
 
If they aren't yet all devout followers of PHX; well, I'd think just brandishing a few more "Integrity Matters" T-shirts and/or "liberty" ties should certainly do the trick....No? 😉
 
"And the arbitrators, knowing USAPA is being coerced by a
court order, will have little reason to take its suggestions seriously."
 
The Honorable Judge Tashima, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  
 
EastUS1 said:
 
If they aren't yet all devout followers of PHX; well, I'd think just brandishing a few "Integrity Matters" T-shirts and/or "liberty" ties should certainly do the trick....No? 😉
Sir, you have had some very insightful posts, the west pilots always attack you as the messenger, never your message.  Keep up your attempted debate of the facts going.
 
Claxon said:
Sir, you have had some very insightful posts, the west pilots always attack you as the messenger, never your message.  Keep up your attempted debate of the facts going.
 
Most kind of you sir, but honestly Brother?....Ever since the vile capitulation via the MOU and the subsequent "contract"; I've mostly just hung around "here" for the laughs, and the clearly futile notion of ever successfully goading some mighty "spartan" punk(s) into accepting a flying wager. When both the MOU and toxic "contract" were so insanely accepted by this group as a whole, well, I gave up all hope of leaving the industry with even a fantasy of ever seeing supposed Pilots demonstrate any spine or collective intelligence here. It all just is what it is, and life goes on anyway.
 
Having said that; it'd certainly be at least good to see the nic obscenity never be allowed to become the tool of a worthless little pack of sad hyenas trying to usurp the worked years of so many I've flown with over time. I strongly suspect it won't though.
 
EastUS1 said:
 
Most kind of you sir, but honestly Brother?....Ever since the vile capitulation via the MOU and the subsequent "contract"; I've mostly just hung around "here" for the laughs, 😉
Yo tambien amigo.
 
Claxon said:
Sir, you have had some very insightful posts, the west pilots always attack you as the messenger, never your message.  Keep up your attempted debate of the facts going.
"In Unity, Mr. Jack Daniels"
 
 
"USAPA’s breach at the expense of the West Pilots.” Maj. Op. at 54. But the
majority never tells us what those “benefits” are. The only “benefit” and the only
assertion that USAPA breached its duty of fair representation, would be in the
makeup of the pilot seniority list. But that list has never been drawn up. The
majority appears to recognize as much, continuing, “Although there remains some
ambiguity over whether the Nicolau Award would have been adopted in toto, to
conclude, as does the dissent, that the West Pilots may not obtain any relief at all is
to grant USAPA the benefit of doubt that USAPA itself created.” Id. But my
purpose is not “to grant USAPA the benefit of doubt,” but to grant it to the district
court’s findings of fact, as the clearly erroneous standard of review requires. Just
as important, I would grant that benefit to the McCaskill-Bond pilot seniority
integration proceeding so that the arbitration board can conduct a proceeding of its
own design."
 
Judge Tashima,  9th Circuit Court of Appeals 
 
Metroyet said:
"In Unity, Mr. Jack Daniels"
 
If you've the spine (purely rhetorical there) to actually make a specifiically direct and personal accusation of any kind; immediately do so and in no uncertain terms. We all know how well you love lawyers, so I'd think you would be happy to....No?
 
"Integrity" after all, at least supposedly "Matters" to you...Right?
 
Metroyet said:
"In Unity, Mr. Jack Daniels"
Yes sir, west pilot attacking messengers, with one swipe, accuse your foe's messengers and not the message when you have nothing to offer in the debate.
 
Footnote 12, 9th?  Footnote 4, Arbitration panel?
 
Your specific thoughts sir, regarding my above inquiries sir? 
 
metroyet left?  The west just lost an original thinking senator, promoting their...?
 
Claxon said:
Yes sir, west pilot attacking messengers, with one swipe, accuse your foe's messengers and not the message when you have nothing to offer in the debate.
 
Footnote 12, 9th?  Footnote 4, Arbitration panel?
 
Your specific thoughts sir, regarding my above inquiries sir?
You two idiots got the hell spanked out of you by the 9th. That isn't just a message, that's a fact....don't shoot the messenger! :lol:

Btw, your footnotes are just that. Kind of like how your fake Union is a footnote in the master scab list.
 
Metroyet said:
.......don't shoot the messenger! :lol:
 
No worries child. No one's issued any Doe tags for "spartans" anywhere this season. Should any irrational, personal concerns yet remain?....You should perhaps best look to your own state's regulations on game animals. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top