HPearlyretiree
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2002
- Messages
- 1,880
- Reaction score
- 1,614
Nothing ever changes
Page 707!
Page 707!
2015 Pilot Discussion.
- Thread starter Eagle
- Start date
- Status
EastUS1 said:
I bet someone is having a morning full of hangover, remorse, and self loathing today.
Get treatment, you are a disaster of a person, and you are going to get people hurt. Your most recent tirade and posts full of angry, raging, nonsensical diarrhea should even embarrass you when you read them with a clear head.
snapthis
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 4,236
- Reaction score
- 6,907
Monkee said:
No doubt. I think an early retirement would be in order.
There are some here which have come under scrutiny, like James Anderson who wrote to Judge Silver and was the subject of an alarming article. The accusations and the fact the case below is unsolved is concerning.
An Unsolved Killing What does the firing of a U.S. Attorney have to do with a murder case?
James Anderson, at the time that the case was dismissed, was a forty-year-old pilot for U.S. Airways, who lived alone in Beaux Arts, a Seattle suburb. On the night of Wales’s murder, Westinghouse told investigators that he thought Anderson should be considered as a suspect. “We were concerned about a number of possibilities, one of which was that the murder might be related to our work, and one subject was the helicopter case,” Westinghouse recalled. For the next several months, he received around-the-clock protection from U.S. marshals.
The F.B.I. has been investigating Anderson during the past six years, but no charges have been brought against him. (Anderson has never agreed to speak to investigators, and he declined to speak to me.) His attorney, Larry Setchell, said, “He is an innocent man and an honest man. Tom Wales was liked by everyone, including us. He did the right thing in our case by dismissing it. We were not mad at him.”
On July 27, 2001, a month after the indictment was dismissed, Anderson filed a motion against the U.S. Attorney’s Office, under an obscure law called the Hyde Amendment. The law, which was enacted in 1997, allows defendants who have been acquitted in federal court to sue the prosecutors in order to recoup their attorneys’ fees and legal expenses, provided they can show that the case was “vexatious, frivolous or in bad faith.” Anderson demanded a hundred and twenty-eight thousand dollars. On August 3, 2001, Wales’s office filed a response to Anderson’s lawsuit in federal district court. “We are convinced that he brings this motion in large part to discover the identity of additional witnesses that he imagines may have contributed to his indictment,” the brief stated. “During the course of the investigation, the Government received information from at least two persons indicative of defendant Anderson’s violent and retributive nature.” Other government documents pertaining to the case remain under seal, and the identities of the persons referred to in the brief have not been made public. In any event, Anderson’s motion was dismissed, and that ruling was upheld on appeal.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/08/06/an-unsolved-killing
nevergiveup
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,125
- Reaction score
- 2,148
She is still a nasty little thing. How are this pylons coming?Ames said:
guess the last bid, pushed these angry lil F/O ' s over the edge , I personally moved up 10 numbers next lawsuit on deck soon!nevergiveup said:
traderjake
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Messages
- 5,669
- Reaction score
- 9,308
luvthe9 said:
What a fool.
Remember Kasher will pay?
nevergiveup
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,125
- Reaction score
- 2,148
and the south is gonna rise again! well, perhaps they were talking about the Tidetraderjake said:
traderjake
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Messages
- 5,669
- Reaction score
- 9,308
stalkerjake?
Wow, stupid and paranoid.
It's nice to know I'm always on your mind.
Wow, stupid and paranoid.
It's nice to know I'm always on your mind.
- Status
Similar threads
