What's new
By:

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
luvthe9 said:
These westies have screwed themselves again, 2018 is being optimistic, guess they enjoy stagnation, you would think the west pilots would getting tired of the little AFO club.
Click to expand...
DISMISSED......pulled out of your backside.

:lol:
 
Metroyet said:
Who's my boogeyman? Wtf does that mean? Of course I've given money. Now that the individual scabs are being sued I'll happily give. Who cares where it goes as long as it goes through the unbelievably exhorbitant legal process. No stopping that now! :lol:
Click to expand...
Anyone on this board could explain it to you, or maybe if you think real hard you might figure it out.
Who's going to get us next?
 
Metroyet said:
Who's my boogeyman? Wtf does that mean? Of course I've given money. Now that the individual scabs are being sued I'll happily give. Who cares where it goes as long as it goes through the unbelievably exhorbitant legal process. No stopping that now! :lol:
Click to expand...
It looks like their little club meeting is over. Hey, let's talk about everything that happened in the past. Nevermind the problems they may face in the near future. 😉

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EDDIE BOLLMEIER, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK
)
GARY HUMMEL, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
_____________________________ )
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This matter, having come before the Court on Plaintiffs Eddie Bollmeier, Bill Tracey, and Simon Parrott Motion for Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court having considered Plaintiffs and Defendants respective submissions, and it appearing that good cause exists for granting the Preliminary Injunction because Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if the Preliminary Injunction is not issued, Defendants will not be harmed at all if the Preliminary Injunction is issued and the public interest supports issuance of the Preliminary Injunction, it is this __ day of ___, 2015 hereby ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble, Steve Smyser, Robert Frear, Courtney Borman, Ronald Nelson, Paul Diorio, Paul Music, John Taylor, Jay Milkey, and Stephen Nathan and each of them are preliminarily enjoined from authorizing the expenditure of USAPA funds obtained from the collection of dues and assessments of US Airways pilots during the period that USAPA was the exclusive bargaining agent of US Airways pilots in support of activities of any kind, including but not limited to payment
　
Case 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK Document 16-6 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2 2
　
of attorneys, experts, witnesses, office space or flight pay loss to pilots for purposes of preparing for and participating in the Substantive Seniority Integration Process culminating in an arbitration before Arbitrators Dana Eischen, Ira Jaffe and W. David Vaughn.
2. Because the funds that are the subject of the Complaint in the case will remain with USAPA during the pendency of this case and because USAPA will have access to funds provided by the Allied Pilots Association for the purpose of preparing for and participating in the Substantive Seniority Integration Process, the Court finds pursuant to Rule 65 (c) that no bond is required for the issuance of this Preliminary Injunction.
3. Initial disclosures otherwise required by Rule 26 shall not be required and the parties shall meet in conference pursuant to Rule 26(f) no later than ____, 2015.
4. The Court will hold a status conference on _____, 2015 for the purpose of scheduling further proceedings.
United States District Judge
Case 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK Document 16-6 Filed 03/27/15
 
EastCheats said:
DISMISSED......pulled out of your backside.
:lol:
Click to expand...

Should have taken the NIC when offered, now you'll be stuck in PHX for years to come.


Read it again with me boy.....


" Yes, the East offered the NIC. They just wanted to protect their retirement attrition, which stalled by the change in Age-60. Looking back, that offer must look like a home run to any West pilot right now, "


"Our former MEC and our union leadership played a very high stakes game of poker by not dealing at Wye River. Freund was right, we were risking everything…..and right now, it looks like we lost. They need to take responsibility for that."




EATING YOU UP INSIDE I BET DAY AND NIGHT
 
luvthe9 said:
Should have taken the NIC when offered, now you'll be stuck in PHX for years to come.
Read it again with me boy.....
" Yes, the East offered the NIC. They just wanted to protect their retirement attrition, which stalled by the change in Age-60. Looking back, that offer must look like a home run to any West pilot right now, "
"Our former MEC and our union leadership played a very high stakes game of poker by not dealing at Wye River. Freund was right, we were risking everything..and right now, it looks like we lost. They need to take responsibility for that."
EATING YOU UP INSIDE I BET DAY AND NIGHT
Click to expand...
Boy? :lol:

Coming from the idiot who is Claxon's lap dog. Did your master tell you to post this nonsense?


http://www..com/watch?v=cQb84PNxu5A&sns=em
 
I can't say I'm surprised by this latest development.  The respected Lawless America blog has made serious corruption allegations against the "Honorable" Judge Bobby Baldock.  Hey, a guy's got to pay for the country club membership somehow, right?
 
I will not try to convict a man without due process, though the allegations do appear to be credible.  Stand by for the Phoenix peanut gallery to attempt to prematurely exonerate the judge.
 
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_mtree&task=viewlink&link_id=1907&Itemid=100
 
I just can't help but wonder if the "Honorable" justice put in a good word for Johnny Jurkoff during his bitter divorce and personal bankruptcy?
 
Arizona justice.
 
luvthe9 said:
No, I just luv those quotes, why don't you tell us which one of you idiots turned the NIC down when we offered it to you.
Geez, you guys are so stupid.
Click to expand...
"Wye" would I care now? That was then, the West is done with your dirty deals and cheating ways. You know what's best about a divorce besides a fake Union paying alimony?

Restraining orders 😉

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EDDIE BOLLMEIER, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK
)
GARY HUMMEL, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
_____________________________ )
[PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
This matter, having come before the Court on Plaintiffs Eddie Bollmeier, Bill Tracey, and Simon Parrott Motion for Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court having considered Plaintiffs and Defendants respective submissions, and it appearing that good cause exists for granting the Temporary Restraining Order because Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if the TRO is not issued, it is this __ day of ___, 2015 hereby ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble, Steve Smyser, Robert Frear, Courtney Borman, Ronald Nelson, Paul Diorio, Paul Music, John Taylor, Jay Milkey, and Stephen Nathan and each of them are temporarily restrained from authorizing the expenditure of USAPA funds obtained from the collection of dues and assessments of US Airways pilots during the period that USAPA was the exclusive bargaining agent of US Airways pilots in support of activities of any kind, including but not limited to payment of attorneys, experts, witnesses, office space or flight pay loss to pilots for purposes of
　
Case 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK Document 16-5 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2 2
　
preparing for and participating in the Substantive Seniority Integration Process culminating in an arbitration before Arbitrators Dana Eischen, Ira Jaffe and W. David Vaughn.
2. Because the funds that are the subject of the Complaint in the case will remain with USAPA during the pendency of the case and because Defendants will have access to funds provided by the Allied Pilots Association for the purpose of preparing for and participating in the Substantive Seniority Integration Process, the Court finds pursuant to Rule 65 (c) that no bond is required for the issuance of this Temporary Restraining Order.
3. This Order will expire on ____, 2015 unless extended by the Court for good cause or unless Defendants consent to an extension.
4. The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on _____, 2015.
United States District Judge
 
EastCheats said:
"Wye" would I care now? That was then, the West is done with your dirty deals and cheating ways. You know what's best about a divorce besides a fake Union paying alimony?
Restraining orders 😉
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EDDIE BOLLMEIER, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK
)
GARY HUMMEL, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
_____________________________ )
[PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
This matter, having come before the Court on Plaintiffs Eddie Bollmeier, Bill Tracey, and Simon Parrott Motion for Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court having considered Plaintiffs and Defendants respective submissions, and it appearing that good cause exists for granting the Temporary Restraining Order because Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if the TRO is not issued, it is this __ day of ___, 2015 hereby ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble, Steve Smyser, Robert Frear, Courtney Borman, Ronald Nelson, Paul Diorio, Paul Music, John Taylor, Jay Milkey, and Stephen Nathan and each of them are temporarily restrained from authorizing the expenditure of USAPA funds obtained from the collection of dues and assessments of US Airways pilots during the period that USAPA was the exclusive bargaining agent of US Airways pilots in support of activities of any kind, including but not limited to payment of attorneys, experts, witnesses, office space or flight pay loss to pilots for purposes of
　
Case 3:15-cv-00111-RJC-DCK Document 16-5 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2 2
　
preparing for and participating in the Substantive Seniority Integration Process culminating in an arbitration before Arbitrators Dana Eischen, Ira Jaffe and W. David Vaughn.
2. Because the funds that are the subject of the Complaint in the case will remain with USAPA during the pendency of the case and because Defendants will have access to funds provided by the Allied Pilots Association for the purpose of preparing for and participating in the Substantive Seniority Integration Process, the Court finds pursuant to Rule 65 (c) that no bond is required for the issuance of this Temporary Restraining Order.
3. This Order will expire on ____, 2015 unless extended by the Court for good cause or unless Defendants consent to an extension.
4. The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on _____, 2015.
United States District Judge
Click to expand...
Still did not answer the question....... Again the above DISMISSED, Marty laughing at you fools better sell some more ties.

I don't get it we offered you what you wanted, the NIC and you turn it down, how is that a dirty deal? I bet any west pilot
Would think that offer looks like a home run.


You guys keep embarrassing yourselves, it's really too much.
 
It's insane to call this place a law school!  The lowest of the low doesn't even begin to describe it.
 
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/16/law-schools-compete-students-many-may-not-have-admitted-past
 
<<The seven law schools with the lowest median LSAT scores portray themselves as schools of opportunity for students who think they can make it but may not have the scores or grades to prove it. The same schools can also be accused of irresponsibly admitting some students who don't belong in law school.
 
Three of the seven schools with the lowest median LSAT scores are in the for-profit Infilaw system. Those are Arizona Summit Law School, Florida Coastal School of Law and the Charlotte School of Law in North Carolina.>>
 
dariencc said:
It's insane to call this place a law school!  The lowest of the low doesn't even begin to describe it.
 
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/16/law-schools-compete-students-many-may-not-have-admitted-past
 
<<The seven law schools with the lowest median LSAT scores portray themselves as schools of opportunity for students who think they can make it but may not have the scores or grades to prove it. The same schools can also be accused of irresponsibly admitting some students who don't belong in law school.
 
Three of the seven schools with the lowest median LSAT scores are in the for-profit Infilaw system. Those are Arizona Summit Law School, Florida Coastal School of Law and the Charlotte School of Law in North Carolina.>>
Click to expand...

Well thats part of the reason these guys ended up at America Worst, they could not get hired ANYWHERE else. Seems to be a pattern here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

K
AA to Pay 30 Cents Less Per Gal of Fuel Than DL/UA in 2015
2 3 4
Replies
51
Views
9K
jcw
J
H
MIA-FRA
6 7 8
Replies
117
Views
17K
jcw
J
Crash Pad DCA
Envoy Air to close its New York base by end of the year
Replies
9
Views
2K
nycbusdriver
N
F
While DL and WN grow, AA continues to cut future growth
Replies
4
Views
2K
WorldTraveler
WorldTraveler
F
AA pilots don't like the new uniforms
2
Replies
24
Views
6K
UPNAWAY
UPNAWAY

Latest posts

Back
Top