What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
cactusboy53 said:
Pretzle Logic & you boys are cheats. Not that tough to understand, Bub.
 
You nonsensical quips notwithstanding, the reality is that we are still separate.  We like it that the reality agrees with us and you live in Fantasyland.
 
But I'm sure you will provide us with another lunatic quip for our entertainment.  Thank you for all the laughs at your expense over the years.  It's sad that your circus antics will be coming to close soon.
 
Okay now, Easties!   Wait for it.....
 
cactusboy53 said:
Right Dorothy. Click those heels, USAPA-Ville is right around the corner.

Still No NIC for you, you really blew it.......


How about a big smile
 
cactusboy53 said:
Pretzle Logic & you boys are cheats. Not that tough to understand, Bub.
pret·zel
ˈpretsəl/
noun
1.
a crisp biscuit baked in the form of a knot or stick and flavored with salt.
verbNORTH AMERICAN
1.
twist, bend, or contort.
"he found the snake pretzeled into a tangle of knots"

Please use spell check if you are going to continue
 
cactusboy53 said:
Poond saand
Your "vengeance will not taste sweet".  The SLI BOA will not provide a "spoonful of sugar" for you in their ruling.
 
Using proverbs as an anecdote to your posts. 
 
Pretzel logic is persuading Liberty Tie owners that the East upgrades and wide body positions on the April bid.. Are not real.
 
Pretzel Logic was a great album.............





Someone keep an eye on Davey boy he's on the edge of another meltdown knowing the NIC is history


Hang on son the end is near maybe a year or two left in the fishbowl



"We did it to ourselves, guys."

Dave Blomgren, for the U-Turn............. And you were a big help!
 
Good morning children.  Today's lesson is considered an "idiom".  The idiom is "FOOL'S ERRAND"
 
FOOL'S ERRAND
 
A task which is widely known to be unwise, yet is carried out against a person's better judgement.
 
"Steven specifically asked Katzenbach about the formation of a new bargaining agent as an avenue of advance to get around this award.  The legal expert advised him against giving the other side a large body of evidence that the sole reason for the new union is to abrogate an arbitration.  Those reviewing this piece of evidence said doing so would be considered a fool's errand."
 
 
Ah, and oldie but a goodie...
 
[SIZE=12pt]“Actually, it is USAPA that is needlessly delaying the resolution of the seniority dispute and jeopardizing the enforceability of the agreement the parties are able to reach. …….The arbitrator’s decision was to be final and binding on both pilot groups and was to be accepted by the Company so long as certain conditions were met.  The Nicolau Award has resulted in four years of litigation including a trial in federal court and jury verdict fining USAPA’s proposal for a non-Nicolau list to constitute an unlawful breach of the union’s duty of fair representation….”[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=12pt]Paul D. Jones; Vice President – Legal Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]Exhibit 1 of  Declaration of Counsel; Case 13-15000, 02/20/2013[/SIZE]
 
Now I'm going to quote Dave Blom.....Bloom...Blum...  Oh wait!  No I'm not.  😀 :lol: 😀
 
[SIZE=12pt]In the matter of: Preliminary Arbitration Board APA/USAPA/AA (December 17, 2014)[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=12pt]ARBITRATOR JAVITS: All three lists. I guess the gravamen of the questions is are you then putting yourself in the place of Nicolau, are you the new Nicolau because you are proposing a list which may not reflect Nicolau's list? ….. And American pilots. And, therefore, you're making a proposal, which may be different than what Nicolau had in mind[/SIZE] [SIZE=12pt]and issued back in '07.[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=12pt]MR. FREUND (in closing):As the Chairman put it so nicely in his questioning of Jess Pauley, what the US -- what the East Committee, the US Airways Committee, the USAPA Committee, call it what you want, what it wants to do is to put itself in the place of George Nicolau and redo what George did in 2007.[/SIZE]
 
 
[SIZE=12pt]Pretzel's anyone?  Yummy.[/SIZE]
 
cactusboy53 said:
Now I'm going to quote Dave Blom.....Bloom...Blum...  Oh wait!  No I'm not.  😀 :lol: 😀
 
In the matter of: Preliminary Arbitration Board APA/USAPA/AA (December 17, 2014)
 
ARBITRATOR JAVITS: All three lists. I guess the gravamen of the questions is are you then putting yourself in the place of Nicolau, are you the new Nicolau because you are proposing a list which may not reflect Nicolau's list? .. And American pilots. And, therefore, you're making a proposal, which may be different than what Nicolau had in mind and issued back in '07.
 
MR. FREUND (in closing):As the Chairman put it so nicely in his questioning of Jess Pauley, what the US -- what the East Committee, the US Airways Committee, the USAPA Committee, call it what you want, what it wants to do is to put itself in the place of George Nicolau and redo what George did in 2007.
 
 
Pretzel's anyone?  Yummy.

Definte meltdown going on.......... Sorry you gave up the NIC, Wye that must really upset you

Hold on Davey boy it's almost over and Marty wants his money fool



You just keep doing a few more laps in the fishbowl. Should have listened to Dave........ Made you look real stupid .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top