AA Terminating 777 Leases
- Thread starter AMFAMAN
- Start date
Ooo...good job. You went to the Star Alliance website and copied down all those members to yourself?
TACA and TAM aren't associated with Star (just United), and Emirates is not associated with any alliance, not even as a "regional alliance partner." (Are you that big of an idiot that you can't realize Emirates isn't a regional airline?).
MODERATOR
Why does he get away with this little saying? He should be warned or banned for calling someone names.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"driver",
TRUST me...........eolesen, + "beauty" can take care of themselves.
So we agree to disagree. No need for the PC police, on THE toughest thread on US Aviation !!
(Except when the language gets too rough, from time to time)
AND as for you................(TROLL)'beauty"
While Asia and India are hottest spots in the planet,.............Do you have ANY IDEA, how much "Do--ray..me" $$$$$$$$$ AA is making in SA ??????
"NO(beauty)....I did'nt think so" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
eolesen.
With regard to your post (#34);
When I suggest..."Reduce mainline significantly", I mean turn it over to A/E.
(Ex.)
Bdl went from mainline to A/E for all(4/5) of there ORD trips. The "jungle jets" are FULL. Now, it would stand to reason, that if BDL were to close, and become A/E, if we were able to put AA's customers on Ejets to ORD + DFW, I (strongly) suggest to you, that the "roomy" Ejets would be FULL.
I don't see how this becomes a PAA situation ??
With regard to your post (#34);
When I suggest..."Reduce mainline significantly", I mean turn it over to A/E.
(Ex.)
Bdl went from mainline to A/E for all(4/5) of there ORD trips. The "jungle jets" are FULL. Now, it would stand to reason, that if BDL were to close, and become A/E, if we were able to put AA's customers on Ejets to ORD + DFW, I (strongly) suggest to you, that the "roomy" Ejets would be FULL.
I don't see how this becomes a PAA situation ??
donttouchthebeauty
Veteran
- Jan 11, 2006
- 545
- 0
You better check again, Emirates is a regional alliance partner with UAL... Check your facts, nowhere did i state that Emirates is a regional carrier.. They are a Regional Alliance member with UAL... Get over it, you're wrong..
donttouchthebeauty
Veteran
- Jan 11, 2006
- 545
- 0
Your so right, Singapore Airlines, THAI, Lufthansa, ANA, UAL... We're all just nasty old airlines... Give it up FAMikey... OneWorld wasn't on top of its game like STAR... OneWorld would take AirIndia and AirChina in a NY minute but they chose the STAR instead.. OneWorld isn't a secret society, but you sure like to play it is.. The real truth is they have lagged behind STAR and SKYTEAM, now there arent that many players left to be snagged and if the players that are left, go to an alliance, it will be one that benfits them the most, and that won't be OneWorld... Get over yourself FAMikey, it will help you in the longrun,, there is not a carrier in this world with 365 super 80-s that is a world class carrier.. and thats a fact!!!!
LGA Fleet Service
Veteran
MCI transplant
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2003
- 5,311
- 587
<_< ------- Good mourning local!---- As far as the condition of those MD-80's. maybe it has something to do with the fact that AA's has been" trying to" maintain them for the past six+ years! Because we haven't been doing them here!!!
MCI transplant
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2003
- 5,311
- 587
<_< ------ Princess! Princess! Princess!------ The reason you got our 767 MBV's was the fact that we didn't have the head count to do both the CIP's and the MBV's! The eggheads in Marketing wanted to sell those seats before they were even installed! It took AFW six weeks plus, on that first Aircraft, with 120+ AMT's! Marketing wanted them done in nine days! When AFW told them it couldn't be done in that time frame. AA threatened to send it to MCI! AFW told them go right ahead! They did! ----- Well, AFW was right on one score. It couldn't be done in nine days! Marketing finally backed off to fifteen days. We had it down to thirteen there at the last! That's with less than half the number of AMT's working the Aircraft!-------- That incidence with the drilled wiring was true. A lot of the management hero's you refer to are AA rejects. Sent here with the understanding that if they don't make it here, they're gone! You people at AFW should know all about that! They don't call you the "penal colony" for nothing! ----- As for screwing up the CIP's! I guess we screwed them up so bad that they're going to let us screw up the 767 200's also! And rumor has it they even may let us screw up the 757 interiors too! Our wiring is so bad that they're going to let us screw up the cockpits with the "MAUI" mods! And the Internet interface mod. Now!---- let's talk belly corrosion! AA still hasn't figured out that you don't take a fire hose, with God knows how much pressure, into the cargo compartments to clean them out during a MBV! All it does is blast away sealant, and get moisture into areas that it shouldn't be, the result is corrosion! Talk is we may see a line of MBV's (767's) back here with belly skin replacements! But if there's one thing I learned it's nothing is ever set in stone with this outfit!
ch53D
Senior
- Jan 21, 2007
- 260
- 3
Let’s not go banging on MCI. AFW is no better. Over the years I’ve seen a lot out of AFW when an A/C shows up at the gate. It’s been bad enough DFW Tech Crew Chiefs need to be on the test hop at AFW to make sure we don’t have problems on the gate at DFW.
whatkindoffreshhell
Veteran
I spend more money with EK, QR & US than you and PineyBob combined spend on Gold Bond powder.
Similar threads
