Crzipilot
Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2004
- Messages
- 906
- Reaction score
- 254
Yes I am. When this "merger" was consumated I was a captain with 7 years at AWA. US Airways had pilots at the very bottom of their list, FO's on reserve who "worked far longer than myself".
I have no intention of stepping aside simply because your bottom dwelling FO's chose to cling to a crappy job at a failing carrier. I chose AWA and never considered applying to the failing carrier because I saw a better future at AWA.
If you fools were to get your way I would have pilots who were on furlough, with no more than 6 years of active service placed more than 700 numbers senior to me.
Unacceptable.
Interesting to say the least. So you had 7 yrs when the merger was consumated. So go back 7 years and that was what. '98? So your saying in '98 AWA was the best value, and had the best outlook going forward of all the majors out there? Uhmmm...ok, ya right. I think the hundreds of f/o's that churned the bottom of your seniority list at that time would beg to differ....
Sounds like the guy that was on my J/S discussing the whole deal. His explanation of choosing AWA in '99 was the fact that he noticed the rapid turnover. So he could rise in seniority fairly quickly and hold that left seat real fast. As he was coming out of the military and didn't want to wait 10yrs for the left seat, he wanted it ASAP. And the NIC itself was going to help him achieve that goal. Simple explanation that back in '99 AWA wasn't exactly burning the trail on f/o pay etc etc, he said it didn't matter as with the amount of turn over he would have reached the left seat quickly and gotten the golden ring, but the merger put a nix on that......whatever..