So now we need to decide what constitutes proper bandwidth do we....usfliboi said:I have an idea! Since this has nothing to do with aviation, why doesnt someone just close the thread? If theres a problem then it should be discussed in a closed forum. I mean this is entertaining, but taking up band width!
Hmm, I take it that your comment is yet another example of "unbiased"?
So, If you are considered "bad", than I get draged along with you? That's not discrimminating?
Tell you what Mr. Moderator, I assume by your remarks that I will be getting the fine once over look at everything I post. Make sure you make the "right call". :angry:
Well, there is the issue of whether or not this topic relates to US Airways...PITbull said:If Bill closes the thread, that would be a biased, and pregudice move against certain posters. After all, we are all on topic.
It's all subjective, but I know the difference. Often for example I laugh out loud reading Lightyear's posts. I see her as very witty, sharp, slightly sarcastic, but still kind. For those of some others I wince. I guess I just have a different threshold for what's considered appropriate.PITbull said:bbost,
There is a difference between "wit" and "sarcasm". Moderators need to be able to distinquish which is being used. And being sarcastic is not necessarily insulting.
Some are more "witty" than others....you catch the drift B)
OK, since you were the the originator of the thread. It shall be done.BillLumbergh said:Well, there is the issue of whether or not this topic relates to US Airways...