What's new

Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

Status
Not open for further replies.
10435903_10205146539201748_4644805565506192502_n.jpg
 
REVENUE is the company's responsibility to generate.

Pay relative to peers is the company's responsibility.

DL pays the highest level of profit sharing in the industry.

DL quite simply generates far more revenue per seat mile and per employee.

given that a number of AA FAs are saying that they want profit sharing just like DL FAs have, it seems you have it all backwards about who thinks they have a better deal.
 
I wouldn't call the 16 votes shot down a huge shoot down for AA   but they did what they did   they got their say  and a vote   something DL FAs don't get
 
sure DL FAs voted.. they have voted far more times than any other workgroup.

the answer has consistently been no.

and the process is democratic. 16 votes seems like a bummer but AA FAs didn't buy the story they were fed - esp. that they had an industry leading contract when it was clearly inferior to WN and DL's pay and profit sharing.
 
Did the DL FAs negotiate and vote on their raises?
 
Did the DL FAs negotiate and vote on the 33% cut in profit sharing from 15% to 10%?
 
Did the DL FAs negotiate and vote on the raises in healthcare and cuts to plans offered?
 
And hence this from a CURRENT DL FA, not you.
 
http://xppoi1nm5s92xm932cfvmdqnr.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/07/Julien-Tudor-2.pdf
 
http://www.iamtransportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/06/Martin-Rosa-Tank.flier-Final.pdf
 
and yet the majority of DL FAs have repeatedly said "NO"


they don't think they can do better.

AA FAs with their union do.
 
southwind said:
How observant Sherlock !
Like the way the personal attack issue, isn't an issue until an anti-union peep does it!
 
No its an issue when someone b**ches about personal attacks and can't even get out of the same post before posting a personal attack. 
 
Repeatedly?
 
How many times in the past 50 years have they voted on a union?
 
Dates please.
 
You do realize it took three different campaigns and a runoff election for US fleet to become unionized?
 
And yet you didnt answer ONE single question asked.

Typical when you know the answer isnt the message you want out.
 
wonderful for US.

DL FAs have voted down unions multiple times.

you're quite adept with google... you should be able to find the dates.

and none of it changes that AA FAs want better than they got while the DL FAs who want a union are the minority; if they were the majority, we'd have a union by now.

but we don't.

typical that you don't want to hear that reality. .
 
700UW said:
Repeatedly?
 
How many times in the past 50 years have they voted on a union?
 
Dates please.
 
You do realize it took three different campaigns and a runoff election for US fleet to become unionized?
 
And yet you didnt answer ONE single question asked.

Typical when you know the answer isnt the message you want out.
November 2010: http://news.delta.com/index.php?s=20295&item=123513

May 2008: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2008-05-29-delta-attendants_N.htm

February 2002: http://unitedafa.org/news/dearafa/archives/details.aspx?id=3540

Unions can't take no for an answer that's why they have to hold multiple drives and hope they can mislead and dupe just enough workers to get the vote to pass.

Josh
 
so youre speaking "we" as if youre the spokesman for all DL FAs now???  typical of mgmt. regardless of whether theyr revenue or not!   pathetic.   I sure as hell hope to see DL become UNION bec the folks there deserve to have a say in matters  deserve to have far better than what they have now.   Now they are AT WILL employees and DL can and has done what so ever they please..    And it does not make sense why some airports their make up area is outsourced yet the ramp   go figure that out
 
robbedagain said:
I wouldn't call the 16 votes shot down a huge shoot down for AA   but they did what they did   they got their say  and a vote   something DL FAs don't get
And apparently, from past indications, don't want!
 
topDawg said:
No its an issue when someone b**ches about personal attacks and can't even get out of the same post before posting a personal attack. 
No! It's an issue where the originator of this topic, doesn't adhere to the topic they started and people like you, not holding him accountable!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top