WorldTraveler said:
I'm not making any threats to anyone.
"Delta FAs will pay if they join a union"
That is a threat. Now is a meaningless threat but a threat.
WorldTraveler said:
because it is absolutely true that DL is under no obligation to continue locking DL FA salary increases and benefits to other non-contract employee groups.
WT you live in a world full of stupid if you think that
1) Delta isn't going to come to a good agreement, professional agreement, that includes yearly pay raises with the pilots, dispatchers and FAs(if they join) when they are making money like they are. Anderson has already stressed how important it is to have union and non-union employees on the bus.
2) Delta is going to punish the FA group for joining a union. They haven't done so with any other work group and wont start now.
3) Expect Delta to just do anything they wish with the FA group. As much as you hate it (because you hate labor) that is the point of a Union. Delta wont be able to just do whatever.
WorldTraveler said:
I would never expect the truth on that reality to come from you or any of the pro-union propaganda pushers on this board but DL FAs will have to negotiate a new agreement with DL mgmt. and, as Josh notes could very easily include terms which are different from what DL offers now AND what is different from what DL's competitors include in their CBAs.
I will never expect you to learn any business, economic, management, labor relations sense.
Or the basic ability to read and comprehended English.
You and Josh are so far over your head, and yours is from 100% butt hurt that the FAs would get the cards, it is sad. I honestly feel sorry for you at this point.
WorldTraveler said:
IF FAs at other airlines have to be treated the same as other employee groups at the same airline, then you wouldn't have all of the backstabbing between labor groups that goes on at AA and UA - and which are documented on a minute by minute basis on this website.
Where? OTHER AIRLINES.
United isn't Delta.
American isn't Delta.
What makes Delta Delta is the fact that they can work with all the work groups, union or not, to come to fair agreements. You don't understand that because you were a part of trying to destroy Delta Air Lines, not build it up. What Leo taught you is not the real Delta.
you really should become an AA fan boy. You would fit in much better. Most of them hate labor just like you do.
WorldTraveler said:
This website is THE BEST advertising of the cutthroat, competitive labor environment that will take place between DL FAs and other DL labor groups because that is the environment which LABOR UNIONS themselves propose.
This web site has one FA.
And I am pretty sure Meto, Me, Kev and Baba are all in the same boat in that we want all of us to do well. Union or no union.
If Kev gets a raise and I don't then good for him. I don't need to me too. I make enough money. I'm happy. If those guys and gals can better themselves then right on.
Meto is a great example, I have no issue with him or any other pilots. They have some things better than us. Do I get angry or blame him? No his union is doing its job.
WorldTraveler said:
DL has made it clear in the past that when the non-pilot workgroups have tried to unionize, DL will do everything possible to benefit those who stay non-union.
Under Richard Anderson, not the idiots who were running the show while you were there, but under Richard Anderson give me an example of this.
WorldTraveler said:
To believe that the same thing won't happen again or that the FAs will continue the wins that they have accumulated under the DL direct relationship is nothing short of naïve.
WT You have no idea if the FAs have wins or not. Give me 5 Delta FA work rules that don't have anything to do with base pay or profit sharing.
now do so for AA.
You can't because you have no friggin idea what you are talking about.
WorldTraveler said:
I know you are living vicariously thru the FA election but there isn't even a hint of an election in maintenance which should tell you out of place you are with your coworkers.
As I said about two pages ago(and 34573058374589037590 other times). I don't want a union. You don't want to believe, are to stupid to understand it or just ignore the fact but I could honestly completely and totally 100% not muster an ounce of give a crap if they vote in a union or not. It literally means nothing to me.
All I want to see is everyone vote. Union, not union whatever I hope every single FA takes the time to vote. As I just said, I do not know enough about the FA work group, their work rules and benefits (and in comparison to other airlines) to know if they are better off or not without a union. Unlike you I don't talk just to talk. I have no opinion on this because I am not educated on the FA QOL to say what I would or would not do.
All I can do, is point out all the misinformation, stupidity and fear pushing that you constantly push. I hope that anyone who reads what you write about Delta and labor understands that you have no idea what you are talking about.
WorldTraveler said:
GO be an FA and you can help the IAM win the election.
WT about the only reason I would hope the IAM would win is just to watch you melt down.
but unlike you and josh this isn't a game and I am not a child. So I just hope each FA makes the right choice for them based of off FACTS and not fear. (and VOTES!)
Hey Kev, 700, or anyone else who knows quick question, this is for WT cause he clearly can't get it, Do I want TechOps to vote in a union?